2005-Ohio-2188, 827 N.E.2d 326 Sivey v. Alliance City Bd. of Health. 2005-0616.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 11, 2005. Stark App. No. 2004-CA-00253, 2005-Ohio-1436. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion denied. LUNDBERG STRATTON and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent.
Articles Tagged: 827 N.E.2d 326
STATE v. LOVE, 105 Ohio St.3d 1543 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2188, 827 N.E.2d 326 State v. Love. 2005-0241.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 11, 2005. Mahoning App. No. 03 MA 19, 2004-Ohio-7062. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. II; cause held for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2004-1568, State v. Foster, Licking […]
SPIVEY v. KELLER, 105 Ohio St.3d 1543 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2188, 827 N.E.2d 326 Spivey v. Keller. 2005-0180.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 11, 2005. Hardin App. No. 6-04-09, 2004-Ohio-6667. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decision in 2004-1492 and 2004-1647, Estate of Harrold v. Collier, Wayne App. No. 03CA0064, 2004-Ohio-4331; and briefing schedule stayed. PFEIFER, J., dissents.
STATE v. GAUNTT, 105 Ohio St.3d 1542 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2188, 827 N.E.2d 326 State v. Gauntt. No. 2005-0540.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 11, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 82175, 2003-Ohio-4942. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.
STATE v. CREAGER, 105 Ohio St.3d 1542 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2188, 827 N.E.2d 326 State v. Creager. No. 2005-0560.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 11, 2005. Clermont App. No. CA2004-12-106. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. MOYER, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissent. Page 1543
STATE v. BAKER, 105 Ohio St.3d 1542 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2188, 827 N.E.2d 326 State v. Baker. No. 2005-0525.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 11, 2005. Columbiana App. No. 03 CO 24, 2005-Ohio-565. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.
STATE v. ALEXANDER, 105 Ohio St.3d 1542 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2188, 827 N.E.2d 326 State v. Alexander. No. 2005-0559.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 11, 2005. Muskingum App. No. CT2004-0021, 2004-Ohio-6990. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. PFEIFER, J., dissents.
AUSTIN v. WEBB-LEWIS, 105 Ohio St.3d 1542 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2188, 827 N.E.2d 326 Austin v. Webb-Lewis. No. 2005-0168.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 11, 2005. Franklin App. No. 04AP-1135. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that Sidney T. Lewis and Yvonne D. Webb-Lewis are found to be vexatious litigators under S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(5)(B). Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the […]
STATE v. LYONS, 105 Ohio St.3d 1542 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2188, 827 N.E.2d 326 State v. Lyons. No. 2005-0532.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 11, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 84377, 2005-Ohio-392. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion denied. RESNICK and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent.
STATE v. HARTSOCK, 105 Ohio St.3d 1543 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2188, 827 N.E.2d 326 State v. Hartsock. 2005-0202.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 11, 2005. Lucas App. No. L-03-1215, 2004-Ohio-6905. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. III; cause held for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2004-1568, State v. Foster, Licking App. No. […]
STATE v. WOODS, 105 Ohio St.3d 1543 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2188, 827 N.E.2d 326 State v. Woods. 2005-0578.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 11, 2005. Lawrence App. No. 02CA22, 2003-Ohio-7337. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.
STATE v. BAKER, 105 Ohio St.3d 1542 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2188, 827 N.E.2d 326 State v. Baker. No. 2005-0516.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 11, 2005. Franklin App. No. 03AP-1104, 2004-Ohio-3380. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.
STATE v. CARTER, 105 Ohio St.3d 1542 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2188, 827 N.E.2d 326 State v. Carter. No. 2005-0550.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 11, 2005. Franklin App. No. 03AP-778, 2005-Ohio-291. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion granted. RESNICK and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent.
SMITH v. CONLEY, 105 Ohio St.3d 1543 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2188, 827 N.E.2d 326 Smith v. Conley. 2005-0247.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 11, 2005. Stark App. No. 2004CA00068, 2004-Ohio-7057. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. II. LUNDBERG STRATTON and LANZINGER, JJ., would accept the discretionary appeal on all propositions of law. RESNICK, PFEIFER and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent. Motion to […]