STATE v. GALLOWAY, 106 Ohio St.3d 1465 (2005)

2005-Ohio-3490, 830 N.E.2d 1171 State v. Galloway. No. 2005-0297.Supreme Court of Ohio. July 13, 2005. Lucas App. No. L-05-1024. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS Reported at 105 Ohio St.3d 1562, 2005-Ohio-2447, 828 N.E.2d 117. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Read More

STATE v. PENCE, 106 Ohio St.3d 1464 (2005)

2005-Ohio-3490, 830 N.E.2d 1171 State ex rel. Timken Co. v. Pence. No. 2004-1875.Supreme Court of Ohio. July 13, 2005. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS In Mandamus. Reported at 105 Ohio St.3d 1541, 2005-Ohio-2188, 827 N.E.2d 325. On motion for Page 1465 reconsideration. Motion granted; cause held for the decision in 2004-1941, State ex rel. Internatl. Paper […]

Read More

SHERRILLS v. OHIO ADULT PAROLE AUTH., 106 Ohio St.3d 1465 (2005)

2005-Ohio-3490, 830 N.E.2d 1171 Sherrills v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth. No. 2005-0154.Supreme Court of Ohio. July 13, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 84522, 2004-Ohio-6916. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS Reported at 105 Ohio St.3d 1544, 2005-Ohio-2188, 827 N.E.2d 327. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Read More

AYCOX v. COLUMBUS BD. OF EDN., 106 Ohio St.3d 1465 (2005)

2005-Ohio-3490, 830 N.E.2d 1171 Aycox v. Columbus Bd. of Edn. No. 2005-0383.Supreme Court of Ohio. July 13, 2005. Franklin App. No. 03AP-1285, 2005-Ohio-69. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS Reported at 105 Ohio St.3d 1563, 2005-Ohio-2447, 828 N.E.2d 118. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Read More

STATE v. CHEWNING, 106 Ohio St.3d 1465 (2005)

2005-Ohio-3490, 830 N.E.2d 1171 State v. Chewning. No. 2005-0185.Supreme Court of Ohio. July 13, 2005. Clermont App. No. CA2004-01-002, 2004-Ohio-6661. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS Reported at 105 Ohio St.3d 1544, 2005-Ohio-2188, 827 N.E.2d 327. On motion for reconsideration. Motion granted; discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. III; cause held for the decisions in […]

Read More

STATE v. BUNTING, 106 Ohio St.3d 1465 (2005)

2005-Ohio-3490, 830 N.E.2d 1171 State v. Bunting. No. 2005-0471.Supreme Court of Ohio. July 13, 2005. Stark App. No. 2004CA00259, 2005-Ohio-497. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS Reported at 105 Ohio St.3d 1564, 2005-Ohio-2447, 828 N.E.2d 118. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Read More

OHIO ASSN., SCHOOL EMP. v. SCHOOL EMP. RETIRE., 106 Ohio St.3d 1465 (2005)

2005-Ohio-3490, 830 N.E.2d 1171 Ohio Assn. of Pub. School Emp. v. School Emp. Retirement Sys. Bd. No. 2005-0305.Supreme Court of Ohio. July 13, 2005. Franklin App. No. 04AP-136, 2004-Ohio-7101. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS Reported at 105 Ohio St.3d 1562, 2005-Ohio-2447, 828 N.E.2d 117. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied. MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, J., dissent.

Read More

YOUNG v. CINCINNATI INS. CO., 106 Ohio St.3d 1464 (2005)

2005-Ohio-3490, 830 N.E.2d 1170, 830 N.E.2d 1171 Young v. Cincinnati Ins. Co. No. 2004-0403.Supreme Court of Ohio. July 13, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 82395, 2004-Ohio-54. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS Reported at 105 Ohio St.3d 1252, 2005-Ohio-1941, 826 N.E.2d 309. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied. LUNDBERG STRARFON and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent.

Read More

STEWART v. STEWART, 106 Ohio St.3d 1465 (2005)

2005-Ohio-3490, 830 N.E.2d 1171 Stewart v. Stewart. No. 2005-0455.Supreme Court of Ohio. July 13, 2005. Portage App. Nos. 2003-P-0094 and 2003-P-0122, 2005-Ohio-346. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS Reported at 105 Ohio St.3d 1564, 2005-Ohio-2447, 828 N.E.2d 118. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Read More

ASSET ACCEPTANCE L.L.C. v. STANCIK, 106 Ohio St.3d 1465 (2005)

2005-Ohio-3490, 830 N.E.2d 1171 Asset Acceptance L.L.C. v. Stancik. No. 2005-0224.Supreme Court of Ohio. July 13, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 84491, 2004-Ohio-6912. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS Reported at 105 Ohio St.3d 1545, 2005-Ohio-2188, 827 N.E.2d 327. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Read More

STATE v. GOINS, 106 Ohio St.3d 1465 (2005)

2005-Ohio-3490, 830 N.E.2d 1171 State v. Goins. No. 2005-0064.Supreme Court of Ohio. July 13, 2005. Butler App. No. CA2004-01-004. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS Reported at 105 Ohio St.3d 1561, 2005-Ohio-2481, 828 N.E.2d 116. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Read More

STATE EX REL. BLACKWELL v. CRAWFORD, 106 Ohio St.3d 1466 (2005)

2005-Ohio-3551, 830 N.E.2d 1171, 830 N.E.2d 1172 State ex rel. Blackwell v. Crawford. 2005-1248.Supreme Court of Ohio. July 14, 2005. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that […]

Read More

STATE v. HAAS, 106 Ohio St.3d 1464 (2005)

2005-Ohio-3490, 830 N.E.2d 1171 State ex rel. Bunting v. Haas. No. 2004-1837.Supreme Court of Ohio. July 13, 2005. Stark App. No. 2004CA00328. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS Reported at 105 Ohio St.3d 381, 2005-Ohio-2161, 826 N.E.2d 840. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Read More

STATE v. STILLMAN, 106 Ohio St.3d 1465 (2005)

2005-Ohio-3490, 830 N.E.2d 1171 State v. Stillman. No. 2005-0597.Supreme Court of Ohio. July 13, 2005. Delaware App. No. 04CAA07052, 2004-Ohio-6974. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS Reported at 105 Ohio St.3d 1558, 2005-Ohio-2447, 828 N.E.2d 115. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied. PFEIFER and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent. Page 1466

Read More

STATE v. CRAIG, 106 Ohio St.3d 1466 (2005)

2005-Ohio-3551, 830 N.E.2d 1171 State v. Craig. 2004-1554.Supreme Court of Ohio. July 14, 2005. Summit C.P. No. CR-2003-06-1638. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS This cause is pending before the court as a death penalty appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Summit County. Upon consideration of the appellant’s motion for stay of execution, IT IS […]

Read More

IN RE HOWARD, 106 Ohio St.3d 1466 (2005)

2005-Ohio-3551, 830 N.E.2d 1171 In re Howard. Supreme Court of Ohio. July 14, 2005. MISCELLANEOUS ORDERS On September 24, 2004, this court found Gregory T. Howard to be a vexatious litigator under S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(5)(B). This court further ordered that Howard was prohibited from continuing or instituting legal proceedings in this court without first obtaining leave. […]

Read More