2005-Ohio-3978, 832 N.E.2d 740 STATE EX REL. BOZSIK v. COLLIER. No. 2005-0440.Supreme Court of Ohio. August 10, 2005. In Mandamus. Reported at 105 Ohio St.3d 1557, 2005-Ohio-2447, 828 N.E.2d 113. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
Articles Tagged: 832 N.E.2d 740
IN RE GUARDIANSHIP OF RINEHART, 106 Ohio St.3d 1488 (2005)
2005-Ohio-3978, 832 N.E.2d 740 IN RE GUARDIANSHIP OF RINEHART. No. 2005-0295.Supreme Court of Ohio. August 10, 2005. Montgomery App. No. 20376. Reported at 105 Ohio St.3d 1562, 2005-Ohio-2447, 828 N.E.2d 117. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
ARCHITECTURAL INTERIOR PROD., v. MIARER TRANSP., 106 Ohio St.3d 1489 (2005)
2005-Ohio-3978, 832 N.E.2d 740 ARCHITECTURAL INTERIOR PROD., INC. v. MIARER TRANSP., INC. No. 2005-0389.Supreme Court of Ohio. August 10, 2005. Muskingum App. No. 2004 CA 0027, 2005-Ohio-170. Reported at 105 Ohio St.3d 1564, 2005-Ohio-2447, 828 N.E.2d 118. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
IN RE ESTATE OF WILKERSON, 106 Ohio St.3d 1489 (2005)
2005-Ohio-3978, 832 N.E.2d 740 IN RE ESTATE OF WILKERSON. No. 2005-0435.Supreme Court of Ohio. August 10, 2005. Summit App. No. 22049, 2005-Ohio-159. Reported at 105 Ohio St.3d 1564, 2005-Ohio-2447, 828 N.E.2d 118. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
CINCINNATI INS. v. PRESERVING AFFORDABLE HOUS., 106 Ohio St.3d 1488 (2005)
2005-Ohio-3978, 832 N.E.2d 740 CINCINNATI INS. CO. v. PRESERVING AFFORDABLE HOUS., INC. No. 2005-0281.Supreme Court of Ohio. August 10, 2005. Hamilton App. No. C-040006, 2004-Ohio-7128. Reported at 105 Ohio St.3d 1561, 2005-Ohio-2447, 828 N.E.2d 117. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied. PFEIFER, J., dissents.
STATE EX REL. TOLEDO BLADE v. WORKERS’ COMP., 106 Ohio St.3d 1489 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4096, 832 N.E.2d 740 STATE EX REL. TOLEDO BLADE CO. v. OHIO BUR. OF WORKERS’ COMP. No. 2005-0867.Supreme Court of Ohio. August 10, 2005. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS In Mandamus. This cause came on for further consideration of relator’s motion for an order holding respondents in contempt, for sanctions, for the appointment of a receiver, […]
COLEMAN v. E. CLEVELAND CITY SCHOOL DIST., 106 Ohio St.3d 1488 (2005)
2005-Ohio-3978, 832 N.E.2d 740 COLEMAN v. E. CLEVELAND CITY SCHOOL DIST. BD. OF EDN. No. 2005-0356.Supreme Court of Ohio. August 10, 2005. Cuyahoga App. Nos. 84328 and 84636, 2004-Ohio-7019. Reported at 105 Ohio St.3d 1563, 2005-Ohio-2447, 828 N.E.2d 118. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied. Page 1489
STATE v. McKINNEY, 106 Ohio St.3d 1488 (2005)
2005-Ohio-3978, 832 N.E.2d 740 STATE v. McKINNEY. No. 2004-2060.Supreme Court of Ohio. August 10, 2005. Defiance App. No. 4-04-12, 2004-Ohio-5518. Reported at 105 Ohio St.3d 1561, 2005-Ohio-2447, 828 N.E.2d 116. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.