2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1245 State v. Upshaw. No. 2005-1047.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Clark App. No. 05CA35. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to orief the issue stated at page 3 of the court of appeals’ Decision and […]
Articles Tagged: 833 N.E.2d 1245
STATE v. KREISCHER, 106 Ohio St.3d 1501 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1245 State v. Kreischer. No. 2005-0412.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Perry App. No. 03 CA 20, 2004-Ohio-6854. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay and remand. Motion denied. O’CONNOR, J., dissents.
STATE v. LUCAS, 106 Ohio St.3d 1501 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1245 State v. Lucas. No. 2005-1226.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Marion App. No. 9-04-40, 2005-Ohio-1092. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.
STATE v. DiCARLO, 106 Ohio St.3d 1501 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1245 State v. DiCarlo. No. 2005-1208.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Mahoning App. No. 02 CA 228, 2004-Ohio-5118. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion granted. RESNICK, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent.
STATE v. BENSON, 106 Ohio St.3d 1501 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1245 State v. Benson. No. 2005-1259.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Marion App. No. 9-04-45, 2005-Ohio-2245. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion granted. RESNICK, PFEIFER and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent. Page 1502
STATE v. FARLEY, 106 Ohio St.3d 1502 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1245 State v. Farley. No. 2005-1267.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Butler App. No. CA2004-04-085, 2005-Ohio-2367. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2005-1164, State v. Farley, Butler App. No. CA2004-04-085, 2005-Ohio-2367; cause held for […]
STATE v. COMBS, 106 Ohio St.3d 1502 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1245 State v. Combs. No. 2005-1301.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Butler App. No. CA2000-03-047, 2005-Ohio-1923. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. Sua sponte, cause held for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, […]
STATE v. TODD, 106 Ohio St.3d 1502 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1245 State v. Todd. No. 2005-1268.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Butler App. No. CA2004-06-123, 2005-Ohio-2270. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2005-1117, State v. Todd, Butler App. No. CA2004-06-123, 2005-Ohio-2270; cause held for […]
STATE v. TREGO, 106 Ohio St.3d 1501 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1245 State v. Trego. No. 2005-1232.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Ross App. No. 04CA2763, 2004-Ohio-5396 and 2004-Ohio-7287. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.
STATE v. LORRAINE, 106 Ohio St.3d 1501 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1245 State v. Lorraine. No. 2005-1216.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Trumbull App. No. 2003-T-0159, 2005-Ohio-2529. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On amended motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion denied. RESNICK, J., dissents.
SMITH v. CONLEY, 106 Ohio St.3d 1501 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1245 Smith v. Conley. No. 2005-0247.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Stark App. No. 2004CA00068, 2005-Ohio-1433. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion to strike appellant’s merit brief. Motion denied.
STATE v. LEACH, 106 Ohio St.3d 1502 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1245 State v. Leach. No. 2005-1260.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 84794, 2005-Ohio-1870. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion granted. RESNICK and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent.
SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. v. DAYTON FREIGHT LINES, 106 Ohio St.3d 1502 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1245 Sherwin Williams Co. v. Dayton Freight Lines. No. 2005-1247.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Montgomery App. No. 20651, 161 Ohio App.3d 444, 2005-Ohio-2773. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated in […]
STATE v. KREISCHER, 106 Ohio St.3d 1501 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1245 State v. Kreischer. No. 2005-0216.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Perry App. No. 03 CA 20, 2004-Ohio-6854. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay and remand. Motion denied. O’CONNOR, J., dissents.