STATE v. WALLACE, 106 Ohio St.3d 1509 (2005)

2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1250 State v. Wallace. No. 2005-0978.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 84808, 160 Ohio App.3d 528, 2005-Ohio-1746. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’DONNELL, J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I.

Read More

STATE v. TULLIS, 106 Ohio St.3d 1510 (2005)

2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1250 State v. Tullis. No. 2005-1092.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Franklin App. No. 04AP-333, 2005-Ohio-2205. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. 1.

Read More

STATE v. WHILE, 106 Ohio St.3d 1510 (2005)

2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1250 State v. While. No. 2005-1122.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Trumbull App. No. 2001-T-0051, 2003-Ohio-4594. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’CONNOR, J., not participating.

Read More

ROBERTS v. REPUBLIC STORAGE SYS. CO., 106 Ohio St.3d 1509 (2005)

2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1250 Roberts v. Republic Storage Sys. Co. No. 2005-1015.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Stark App. No. 2004CA00230, 2005-Ohio-1953. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’DONNELL, J., dissents. LANZINGER, J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. I and II.

Read More

STATE v. UPSHAW, 106 Ohio St.3d 1509 (2005)

2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1250 State v. Upshaw. No. 2005-1048.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Clark App. No. 05CA35. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’CONNOR, J., dissents. LUNDBERG STRATTON and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I.

Read More

STATE v. SKAGGS, 106 Ohio St.3d 1510 (2005)

2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1250 State v. Skaggs. No. 2005-1160.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Wood App. No. WD-04-002, 2004-Ohio-6653. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., dissents and would accept the appeal and hold the cause for the decision State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2005-1568, State v. Foster, Licking App. […]

Read More