2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 380 Pepper Pike v. Dantzig. 2005-1463.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 85287, 2005-Ohio-3468. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion denied.
Articles Tagged: 835 N.E.2d 380
STATE v. WOMACK, 106 Ohio St.3d 1530 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 380 State v. Womack. 2005-1380.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Lucas App. No. L-04-1092, 2005-Ohio-2689. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent.
STATE v. BAIRD, 106 Ohio St.3d 1530 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 380 State v. Baird. 2005-1492.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Madison App. No. CA2003-09-034, 2004-Ohio-6664. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent.
JOHNSON v. FERGUSON-RAMOS, 106 Ohio St.3d 1530 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 380 Johnson v. Ferguson-Ramos. 2005-1490.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Franklin App. No. 04AP-1180, 2005-Ohio-3280. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion denied.
STATE v. BURRIS, 106 Ohio St.3d 1530 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 380 State v. Burris. 2005-1451.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Licking App. No. 2004CA00016, 2004-Ohio-4531. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.
STATE v. REYNOLDS, 106 Ohio St.3d 1530 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 380 State v. Reynolds. 2005-1445.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Mahoning App. No. 93CA242. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.
HORTMAN v. MIAMISBURG, 106 Ohio St.3d 1529 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 380 Hortman v. Miamisburg. 2005-1361.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Montgomery App. No. 20664, 161 Ohio App.3d 559, 2005-Ohio-2862. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 4 Page 1530 of […]
STATE v. JONES, 106 Ohio St.3d 1530 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 380 State v. Jones. 2005-1533.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Summit App. No. 22112, 2005-Ohio-265. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, J., dissent.
STATE v. BATES, 106 Ohio St.3d 1530 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 380 State v. Bates. 2005-1515.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 84654, 2005-Ohio-3411. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion granted. PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON and O’CONNOR, JJ., dissent.
CAMPBELL v. TES FRANCHISING, LLC., 106 Ohio St.3d 1529 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 380 Campbell v. TES Franchising, LLC. 2005-1357.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Butler App. No. CA2004-06-151, 2005-Ohio-2271. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2005-1106, Campbell v. TES Franchising, LLC, Butler App. No. CA2004-06-151, 2005-Ohio-2271; […]
STATE v. SHORT, 106 Ohio St.3d 1530 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 380 State v. Short. 2005-1418.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 73618. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. PFEIFER, J., dissents.
STATE v. MELVIN, 106 Ohio St.3d 1530 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 380 State v. Melvin. 2005-1532.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 84471, 2005-Ohio-2329. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion granted. RESNICK, J., dissents.
STATE v. SEARVILLE, 106 Ohio St.3d 1530 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 380 State v. Searville. 2005-1414.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Franklin App. No. 05AP-141. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. PFEIFER, J., dissents.
AM. FINANCIAL SERV. ASSN. v. TOLEDO, 106 Ohio St.3d 1529 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 380 Am. Financial Serv. Assn. v. Toledo. 2005-1241.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Lucas App. No. L-04-1214, 161 Ohio App.3d 477, 2005-Ohio-2943. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2005-1240, Am. Financial Serv. Assn. v. […]