2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 381 Dunn v. Ethicon, Inc. 2005-1262.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Certified Question of State Law, United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, No. 043826. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On review of preliminary memoranda pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. XVIII(6). The court declines to answer the certified question because the applicable […]
Articles Tagged: 835 N.E.2d 381
IN RE D.S., 106 Ohio St.3d 1531 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 381 In re D.S. 2005-0992.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Warren App. Nos. CA2004-04-036 and CA2004-04-046, 160 Ohio App.3d 552, 2005-Ohio-1803. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. 1. RESNICK and O’CONNOR, JJ., dissent.
STATE v. DANIELS, 106 Ohio St.3d 1531 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 381 State v. Daniels. 2005-1020.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Putnam App. No. 12-04-07, 2005-Ohio-1920. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. II; cause held for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2004-1568, State v. Foster, Licking App. No. […]
STATE v. SANCHEZ, 106 Ohio St.3d 1532 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 381 State v. Sanchez. 2005-1034.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Lucas App. No. L-04-1169, 162 Ohio App.3d 113, 2005-Ohio-2093. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’CONNOR, J., would accept on Proposition of Law I. RESNICK and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent.
STATE v. TAYLOR, 106 Ohio St.3d 1531 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 381 State v. Taylor. 2005-1026.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Athens App. No. 04CA13, 2005-Ohio-2223. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2004-1568, State v. Foster, Licking App. No. 03CA95, 2004-Ohio-4209; and briefing schedule stayed. […]
STATE v. SPELLMAN, 106 Ohio St.3d 1532 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 381 State v. Spellman. 2005-1042.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Geauga App. No. 2004-G-2565, 160 Ohio App.3d 718, 2005-Ohio-2065. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. III; cause held for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2004-1568, State v. […]
STATE v. HARRIS, 106 Ohio St.3d 1531 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 381 State v. Harris. 2005-0983.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Fulton App. No. F-04-005, 2005-1779. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted and cause held on Proposition of Law No. III for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2004-1568, State v. Foster, Licking App. […]
ROBINSON v. BATES, 106 Ohio St.3d 1531 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 381 Robinson v. Bates. 2005-0998.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Hamilton App. No. C-040063, 160 Ohio App.3d 668, 2005-Ohio-1879. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. I and II. RESNICK, PFEIFER and O’CONNOR, JJ., dissent.
STATE v. PAYTON, 106 Ohio St.3d 1530 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 381 State v. Payton. 2005-1556.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Stark App. No. 2004-CA-00019, 2005-Ohio-737. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion Page 1531 denied. O’CONNOR, J., dissents.
BOWLING GREEN v. GODWIN, 106 Ohio St.3d 1531 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 381 Bowling Green v. Godwin. 2005-1560.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Wood App. No. WD-04-094, 2005-Ohio-3204. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 2 of the court of appeals’ Decision […]
HULL v. COLUMBIA GAS OF OHIO, 106 Ohio St.3d 1532 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 381 Hull v. Columbia Gas of Ohio. 2005-1033.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Lucas App. No. L-04-1149, 160 Ohio App.3d 695, 2005-Ohio-2089. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER and O’CONNOR, JJ., dissent.
THORNTON v. SALAK, 106 Ohio St.3d 1531 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 381 Thornton v. Salak. 2005-0880.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Vairfield App. Nos. 03 CA 63 and 03 CA 64, 2005-Ohio-1612. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted. O’CONNOR, J., would accept on Proposition of Law No. I only. Discretionary cross-appeal not accepted. PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent. RESNICK, J., […]