Articles Tagged: 836 N.E.2d 1227

2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1227 State v. Lett. 2005-1421.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Cuyahoga App. Nos. 84707 and 84729, 161 Ohio App.3d 274, 2005-Ohio-2665. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2004-1568, State v. Foster, Licking App. No. […]

2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1227 State v. Jenkins. 2005-1366.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 84644, 2005-Ohio-2824. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. III; cause held for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2004-1568, State v. Foster, Licking App. No. […]

2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1227 State v. Morris. 2005-1345.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Highland App. No. 04CA20, 2005-Ohio-2980. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2004-1568, State v. Foster, Licking App. No. 03CA95, 2004-Ohio-4209; and briefing schedule stayed.

2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1227 State v. Lee. 2005-0855.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Summit App. No. 22262, 2005-Ohio-996. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decision in 2005-0773, State v. Stahl, Summit App. No. 22261, 2005-Ohio-1137; and briefing schedule stayed.

2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1227 Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Commrs. v. State. 2005-1438.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 84305, 162 Ohio App.3d 6, 2005-Ohio-2821. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW RESNICK and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent.

2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1227 State v. Frazier. 2005-1431.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Hancock App. No. 5-04-57, 2005-Ohio-3515. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2004-1568, State v. Foster, Licking App. No. 03CA95, 2004-Ohio-4209; and briefing schedule stayed. […]

2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1227 State v. Atkins-Boozer. 2005-1353.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 84151, 2005-Ohio-2666. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. III; cause held for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2004-1568, State v. Foster, Licking App. No. […]

2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1227 State v. Buehner. 2005-1347.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 84985, 161 Ohio App.3d 546, 2005-Ohio-2828. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW RESNICK, PFEIFER and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent.

2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1227 State v. Paynter. 2005-1319.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Muskingum App. No. CT2004-0015, 2005-Ohio-2911. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. III and IV; cause held for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2004-1568, State v. Foster, Licking […]

2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1227 State v. Hall. 2005-1449.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Cuyahoga App. Nos. 84793 and 85364, 2005-Ohio-3421. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. III; cause held for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2004-1568, State v. Foster, Licking […]

2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1227 State v. Kisseberth. 2005-1393.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Montgomery App. No. 20500, 2005-Ohio-3059. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. 1; cause held for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2004-1568, State v. Foster, Licking App. No. […]

2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1227 Anderson v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co. 2005-1399.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Lucas App. No. L-04-1251, 2005-Ohio-3043. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. 1. MOYER, C.J., O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., would accept on all Propositions of Law. RESNICK and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent.

2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1227 State v. Olekshuk. 2005-1910.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Ashtabula App. No. 2004-A-0030, 2005-Ohio-5275. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion granted. MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent. Page 1406