2005-Ohio-5531, 836 N.E.2d 580 State v. Kelly. 2005-0842.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 26, 2005. Stark App. No. 2004CA00080, 2005-Ohio-739. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal not accepted. Motion to strike denied as moot.
Articles Tagged: 836 N.E.2d 580
STATE v. McREYNOLDS, 106 Ohio St.3d 1554 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5531, 836 N.E.2d 580 State v. McReynolds. 2005-1735.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 26, 2005. Stark App. No. 2004-CA-00023, 2005-Ohio-37. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.
STATE v. FOUT, 106 Ohio St.3d 1555 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5531, 836 N.E.2d 580 State v. Fout. 2005-1447.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 26, 2005. Franklin App. No. 04AP-1139, 2005-Ohio-3151. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted; cause consolidated with 2005-1676, State v. Fout, Franklin App. No. 04AP-1139, 2005-Ohio-3151; causes held for the decisions in 2004-1771 State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2004-1568, […]
STATE v. HATFIELD, 106 Ohio St.3d 1554 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5531, 836 N.E.2d 580 State v. Hatfield. 2005-1746.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 26, 2005. Franklin App. No. 04AP-402, 2004-Ohio-6450. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. PFEIFER, J., dissents.
STATE v. ROBERTS, 106 Ohio St.3d 1554 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5531, 836 N.E.2d 580 State v. Roberts. 2005-1766.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 26, 2005. Hamilton App. Nos. C-040575 and C-050005, 2005-Ohio-4848. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion granted.
IN RE JIM’S SALES, INC., 106 Ohio St.3d 1554 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5531, 836 N.E.2d 580 In re Jim’s Sales, Inc. 2005-1821.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 26, 2005. Lorain App. No. 04CA008601, 2005-Ohio-4086. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion denied. MOYER, C.J., dissents. Page 1555
STATE v. SCOTT, 106 Ohio St.3d 1555 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5531, 836 N.E.2d 580 State v. Scott. 2005-0793.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 26, 2005. Trumbull App. No. 2003-T-0172, 2005-Ohio-689. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal not accepted. Motions to strike denied as moot.
STATE v. SCARBERRY, 106 Ohio St.3d 1554 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5531, 836 N.E.2d 580 State v. Scarberry. 2005-1745.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 26, 2005. Logan App. No. 8-04-32, 2005-Ohio-1425. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2005-0868, State v. Scarberry, Logan App. No. 8-04-32, 2005-Ohio-1425; causes held for the […]
O’CONNOR v. CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUND, 106 Ohio St.3d 1555 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5531, 836 N.E.2d 580 O’Connor v. Cleveland Clinic Found. 2005-1228.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 26, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 84219, 161 Ohio App.3d 43, 2005-Ohio-2328. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. I. MOYER, C.J., and O’DONNELL, J., would accept on all Propositions of Law. PFEIFER, O’CONNOR and LANZINGER, JJ., […]
STATE v. WILLIAMS, 106 Ohio St.3d 1554 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5531, 836 N.E.2d 580 State v. Williams. 2005-1738.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 26, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 85327, 2005-Ohio-3715. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion granted.
STATE v. SATTERWHITE, 106 Ohio St.3d 1555 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5531, 836 N.E.2d 580 State v. Satterwhite. 2005-1343.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 26, 2005. Franklin App. Nos. 04AP-964 and 04AP-965, 2005-Ohio-2823. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2004-1568, State v. Foster, Licking App. No. 03CA95, 2004-Ohio-4209; and briefing […]
STATE v. FIEDLER, 106 Ohio St.3d 1555 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5531, 836 N.E.2d 580 State v. Fiedler. 2005-1249.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 26, 2005. Lake App. No. 2003-L-190, 2005-Ohio-3388. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2004-1568, State v. Foster, Licking App. No. 03CA95, 2004-Ohio-4209; and briefing schedule stayed.
STATE v. McCLANAHAN, 106 Ohio St.3d 1555 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5531, 836 N.E.2d 580 State v. McClanahan. 2005-1412.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 26, 2005. Summit App. No. 22277, 2005-Ohio-2975. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. 1; cause held for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2004-1568, State v. Foster, Licking App. No. […]
STATE v. CUEVAS, 106 Ohio St.3d 1554 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5531, 836 N.E.2d 580 State v. Cuevas. 2005-1774.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 26, 2005. Butler App. No. CA2004-12-299. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion denied. RESNICK and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent.
STATE v. SEMALA, 106 Ohio St.3d 1555 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5531, 836 N.E.2d 580 State v. Semala. 2005-1250.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 26, 2005. Lake App. No. 2003-L-128, 2005-Ohio-2653. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2004-1568, State v. Foster, Licking App. No. 03CA95, 2004-Ohio-4209; and briefing schedule stayed.