2005-Ohio-5987, 837 N.E.2d 378 State ex rel. Bartley v. Fahey Banking Co. 2005-1104.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 14, 2005. Franklin App. No. 04AP-825, 2005-Ohio-2805. MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. Upon consideration of appellant’s application for dismissal, IT IS ORDERED by […]
Articles Tagged: 837 N.E.2d 378
STATE v. SHERRILLS, 107 Ohio St.3d 1413 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5987, 837 N.E.2d 378 State v. Sherrills. 2005-0634.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 14, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 85873. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS This cause came on for further consideration of appellant’s motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Civil Rule 60(B). Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion is denied.
STATE EX REL. HENLEY v. MONEY, 107 Ohio St.3d 1413 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5987, 837 N.E.2d 378 State ex rel. Henley v. Money. 2005-1660.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 14, 2005. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS In Habeas Corpus. This cause came on for further consideration of petitioner’s request for findings of fact and conclusions of law. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED by the court that the request is […]
STATE EX REL. BOZSIK v. LEISY, 107 Ohio St.3d 1414 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5987, 837 N.E.2d 378 State ex rel. Bozsik v. Leisy. 2005-1877.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 14, 2005. MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of relator’s application for dismissal, IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for […]
STATE EX REL. SAUDER WOODWORKING v. PRUETT., 107 Ohio St.3d 1413 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5987, 837 N.E.2d 378 State ex rel. Sauder Woodworking v. Pruett. 2005-0994.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 14, 2005. Franklin App. No. 04AP-395, 2005-Ohio-1762. MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. Upon consideration of appellant’s application for dismissal, IT IS ORDERED by the […]
VOITH SULZER PAPER v. INDUS. COMM., 107 Ohio St.3d 1413 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5987, 837 N.E.2d 378 State ex rel. Voith Sulzer Paper Technology N. Am., Inc. v. Indus. Comm. 2005-0130.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 14, 2005. Franklin App. No. 04AP-65, 2004-Ohio-6613. MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. Upon consideration of appellant’s application for […]
STATE EX REL. RILEY v. INDUS. COMM., 107 Ohio St.3d 1413 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5987, 837 N.E.2d 378 State ex rel. Riley v. Indus. Comm. 2005-1684.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 14, 2005. Franklin App. No. 04AP-953, 2005-Ohio-4453. MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. Upon consideration of appellant’s application for dismissal, is dismissed. Page 1414 IT […]
DUNNING v. KIMBLER, 107 Ohio St.3d 1413 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5987, 837 N.E.2d 378 Dunning v. Kimbler. 2005-1955.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 14, 2005. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS In Prohibition. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.