2006-Ohio-179, 841 N.E.2d 315 State ex rel. Blackwell v. Crawford. 2005-1248.Supreme Court of Ohio. January 25, 2006. In Prohibition. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for sanctions. Motion denied.
Articles Tagged: 841 N.E.2d 315
FAIRCHILDS v. MIAMI VALLEY HOSP., 108 Ohio St.3d 1409 (2006)
2006-Ohio-179, 841 N.E.2d 315 Fairchilds v. Miami Valley Hosp. 2005-0929.Supreme Court of Ohio. January 25, 2006. Montgomery App. Nos. 20493 and 20542, 160 Ohio App.3d 363, 2005-Ohio-1712. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion to strike assignment of error in appellee’s merit brief. Motion denied. Page 1410 LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents and would take the motion […]
STATE EX REL. FLORA v. AMBROSE, 108 Ohio St.3d 1409 (2006)
2006-Ohio-179, 841 N.E.2d 315 State ex rel. Flora v. Ambrose. 2005-2080.Supreme Court of Ohio. January 25, 2006. In Mandamus. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.
IN RE A.S., 108 Ohio St.3d 1410 (2006)
2006-Ohio-179, 841 N.E.2d 315 In re A.S. 2005-2105.Supreme Court of Ohio. January 25, 2006. Summit App. No. 22573, 2005-Ohio-5309. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. Sua sponte, cause held for the decision in 2005-1966, In re A.B., Summit App. No. 22659, 2005-Ohio-4936, and […]
IN RE T.K., 108 Ohio St.3d 1410 (2006)
2006-Ohio-179, 841 N.E.2d 315 In re T.K. 2005-1215.Supreme Court of Ohio. January 25, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 84934, 2005-Ohio-2321. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment and motion for issuance of an order compelling the return of Theodore Kennan to the custody of the Ohio Department of Youth Services. […]
STATE v. JONES, 108 Ohio St.3d 1409 (2006)
2006-Ohio-179, 841 N.E.2d 315 State v. Jones. 1998-1483.Supreme Court of Ohio. January 25, 2006. Ashtabula C.P. No. 97CR221. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On application for reopening under S.Ct.Prac.R. XI(6). Application denied because (1) the appellant failed to comply with the 90-day filing deadline in S.Ct.Prac.R. XI(6)(A) and (2) second or successive applications for reopening are […]
STATE v. ANDERSON, 108 Ohio St.3d 1409 (2006)
2006-Ohio-179, 841 N.E.2d 315 State v. Anderson. 2005-2310.Supreme Court of Ohio. January 25, 2006. Franklin App. No. 04AP-1171, 2005-Ohio-5243. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that no conflict exists. This cause is therefore dismissed. RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur. MOYER, C.J., and O’CONNOR, […]
MIKE v. WARDEN, 108 Ohio St.3d 1409 (2006)
2006-Ohio-179, 841 N.E.2d 315 Mike v. Warden. 2005-2261.Supreme Court of Ohio. January 25, 2006. In Habeas Corpus. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS On petition for writ of habeas corpus of Philip Mike. Sua sponte, cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.
STATE EX REL. McGEE v. JORGENSEN-MARTINEZ, 108 Ohio St.3d 1409 (2006)
2006-Ohio-179, 841 N.E.2d 315 State ex rel. McGee v. Jorgensen-Martinez. 2005-2126.Supreme Court of Ohio. January 25, 2006. In Mandamus. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS On answer of respondent. On S.Ct.Prac.R. X(5) determination, cause dismissed. RESNICK, PFEIFER, O’CONNOR and O’DONNELL, JJ., concur. MOYER, C.J., LUNDBERG STRATTON and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent and would grant an alternative writ.
STATE v. CANTON POLICE PATROLMEN’S ASSN., 108 Ohio St.3d 1409 (2006)
2006-Ohio-179, 841 N.E.2d 315 State ex rel. Conley v. Canton Police Patrolmen’s Assn. 2005-1717.Supreme Court of Ohio. January 25, 2006. In Mandamus. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS On answer of respondent. On S.Ct.Prac.R. X(5) determination, cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.
STATE EX REL. REPOSITORY v. NOVA BEHAVIORAL HLT., 108 Ohio St.3d 1409 (2006)
2006-Ohio-179, 841 N.E.2d 315 State ex rel. Repository v. Nova Behavioral Health, Inc. 2005-0813.Supreme Court of Ohio. January 25, 2006. In Mandamus. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS Sua sponte, the court orders that oral argument be heard.
STATE EX REL. SCRUGGS v. DOAN, 108 Ohio St.3d 1409 (2006)
2006-Ohio-179, 841 N.E.2d 315 State ex rel. Scruggs v. Doan. 2005-2068.Supreme Court of Ohio. January 25, 2006. In Mandamus. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.
STATE v. CRAFT, 108 Ohio St.3d 1410 (2006)
2006-Ohio-179, 841 N.E.2d 315 State v. Craft. 2005-2192.Supreme Court of Ohio. January 25, 2006. Vinton App. No. 04CA589, 2005-Ohio-3944. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. PFEIFER, J., dissents.