STATE EX REL. MONROE v. INDUS. COMM., 108 Ohio St.3d 1468 (2006)

2006-Ohio-689, 842 N.E.2d 1049 State ex rel. Monroe v. Indus. Comm. 2005-2153.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 17, 2006. Franklin App. No. 04AP-1198, 2005-Ohio-5157. MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. Upon consideration of the joint application for dismissal, IT IS ORDERED by […]

Read More

STATE EX REL. BLAIR v. INDUS. COMM., 108 Ohio St.3d 1468 (2006)

2006-Ohio-689, 842 N.E.2d 1049 State ex rel. Blair v. Indus. Comm. 2005-1795.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 17, 2006. Franklin App. No. 04AP-1134, 2005-Ohio-4351. MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. Upon consideration of the Joint application for dismissal, IT IS ORDERED by […]

Read More

STATE v. SMITH, 108 Ohio St.3d 1468 (2006)

2006-Ohio-732, 842 N.E.2d 1049 State v. Smith. 2006-326.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 17, 2006. Clark App. No. 2004-CA-10, 2005-Ohio-7071. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary Page 1469 appeal and claimed appeal of right. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion to continue appellate bond/stay the execution of criminal sanction, […]

Read More

CINCINNATI BAR ASSN. v. BAILEY, 108 Ohio St.3d 1468 (2006)

2006-Ohio-689, 842 N.E.2d 1049 Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Bailey. 2005-1930.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 17, 2006. Board on the Unauthorized Practice of Law; No. UPL 0313. MISCELLANEOUS ORDERS This cause is pending before the court as an unauthorized practice of law case. Upon consideration of respondent’s emergency motion for a ninety day continuance of oral […]

Read More