842 N.E.2d 63 – LexRoll (OH)

STATE v. HOLMES, 108 Ohio St.3d 1438 (2006)

842 N.E.2d 63, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Holmes. No. 2005-1985.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Butler App. No. CA2005-08-209. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW RESNICK and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent and would accept the discretionary appeal and hold the cause for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2004-1568, State […]

STAND ENERGY CORP. v. RUYAN, 108 Ohio St.3d 1437 (2006)

842 N.E.2d 63, 2006-Ohio-421 Stand Energy Corp. v. Ruyan. No. 2005-1962.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Hamilton App. No. C-050004, 2005-Ohio-4846. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent.

STATE v. STILLMAN, 108 Ohio St.3d 1437 (2006)

842 N.E.2d 63, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Stillman. No. 2005-1954.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Delaware App. No. 05CAA04024, 2005-Ohio-5380. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

LANFRANC v. LANFRANC, 108 Ohio St.3d 1437 (2006)

842 N.E.2d 63, 2006-Ohio-421 Lanfranc v. Lanfranc. No. 2005-1960.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Licking App. No. 05CA11, 2005-Ohio-4715. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

STATE v. DISSELL, 108 Ohio St.3d 1438 (2006)

842 N.E.2d 63, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Dissell. No. 2005-1973.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 85072, 2005-Ohio-4395. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissent and would accept the discretionary appeal on Proposition of Law No. V and hold the cause for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. […]

STATE v. SCOTT, 108 Ohio St.3d 1437 (2006)

842 N.E.2d 63, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Scott. No. 2005-1649.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Cuyahoga App. Nos. 84381, 84382, 84383, 84384 and 84389, 2005-Ohio-3690. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents and would accept the discretionary appeal and hold the cause for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. […]

STATE v. WILLIAMS, 108 Ohio St.3d 1437 (2006)

842 N.E.2d 63, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Williams. No. 2005-1972.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 85858, 2005-Ohio-4422. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER and O’CONNOR, JJ., dissent and would accept the discretionary appeal on Proposition of Page 1438 Law No. II and hold the cause for the decisions in 2004-1771 State v. […]

STATE v. ATKINSON, 108 Ohio St.3d 1437 (2006)

842 N.E.2d 63, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Atkinson. No. 2005-1956.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 85773, 2005-Ohio-5348. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

STATE v. LENT, 108 Ohio St.3d 1437 (2006)

842 N.E.2d 63, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Lent. No. 2005-1958.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Washington App. No. 04CA38, 2005-Ohio-4757. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents.

STATE v. McGRATH, 108 Ohio St.3d 1438 (2006)

842 N.E.2d 63, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. McGrath. No. 2005-1974.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 85046, 2005-Ohio-4420. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents.

NATIONSBANC MTGE. CORP. v. DAVET, 108 Ohio St.3d 1438 (2006)

842 N.E.2d 63, 2006-Ohio-421 Nationsbanc Mtge. Corp. v. Davet. No. 2005-1980.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 86862. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

STATE v. MORALES, 108 Ohio St.3d 1438 (2006)

842 N.E.2d 63, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Morales. No. 2005-1981.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Licking App. No. 2004 CA 68, 2005-Ohio-4714. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, J., dissent and would accept the discretionary appeal on Proposition of Law No. III.

STATE v. PATTERSON, 108 Ohio St.3d 1437 (2006)

842 N.E.2d 63, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Patterson. No. 2005-1934.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Mahoning App. No. 04 MA 210, 2005-Ohio-4689. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

CLEVELAND v. WHITMORE, 108 Ohio St.3d 1438 (2006)

842 N.E.2d 63, 2006-Ohio-421 Cleveland v. Whitmore. No. 2005-1977.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 84405, 2005-Ohio-4393. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

AVB PROPERTIES, LLC v. CHESLER, 108 Ohio St.3d 1437 (2006)

842 N.E.2d 63, 2006-Ohio-421 AVB Properties, LLC v. Chesler. No. 2005-1941.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Lorain App. No. 05CA008702. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

COLES v. DANIELS, 108 Ohio St.3d 1437 (2006)

842 N.E.2d 63, 2006-Ohio-421 Coles v. Daniels. No. 2005-1953.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 85573, 2005-Ohio-4701. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’CONNOR, J., dissents and would accept the discretionary appeal on Proposition of Law No. II.

STATE v. SMITH, 108 Ohio St.3d 1437 (2006)

842 N.E.2d 63, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Smith. No. 2005-1935.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Hamilton App. No. C-040512. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

STATE v. SMITH, 108 Ohio St.3d 1438 (2006)

842 N.E.2d 63, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Smith. No. 2005-1982.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Washington App. No. 04CA47, 2005-Ohio-4910. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW RESNICK, PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent and would accept the discretionary appeal on Proposition of Law No. II and hold the cause for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. […]

STATE v. WAIRE, 108 Ohio St.3d 1438 (2006)

842 N.E.2d 63, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Waire. No. 2005-1987.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Hamilton App. No. C-040782, 2005-Ohio-4853. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., dissents and would accept the discretionary appeal and hold the cause for the decision in 2005-2336, State v. Baehler, Cuyahoga App. No. 85796, 2005-Ohio-5717. PFEIFER, J., dissents.

Articles Tagged: 842 N.E.2d 63