2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 793 NATL. CITY COMMERCIAL CAPITAL CORP. v. AAAA AT YOUR SERVICE, INC. No. 2006-0169.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Butler App. No. CA2005-08-219. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated in the […]
Articles Tagged: 843 N.E.2d 793
STATE v. SWANSON, 108 Ohio St.3d 1487 (2006)
2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 793 STATE v. SWANSON. No. 2005-2230.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Ashland App. No. 05 CA 13, 2005-Ohio-5471. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decision in 2005-2336, State v. Buehler, Cuyahoga App. No. 85796, 2005-Ohio-5717; and briefing schedule stayed. PFEIFER, J., would accept the appeal but […]
STATE v. NIPPER, 108 Ohio St.3d 1487 (2006)
2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 793 STATE v. NIPPER. No. 2005-2117.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Butler App. No. CA2005-03-070.
RICE v. CUYAHOGA CTY. DEPT. OF JUSTICE, 108 Ohio St.3d 1487 (2006)
2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 793 RICE v. CUYAHOGA CTY. DEPT. OF JUSTICE. No. 2005-2163.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 85576, 2005-Ohio-5337. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW RESNICK, J., dissents.
STATE v. BYRD, 108 Ohio St.3d 1487 (2006)
2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 793 STATE v. BYRD. No. 2005-2148.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Defiance App. No. 4-05-17, 2005-Ohio-5613. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. BYRD, 108 Ohio St.3d 1487 (2006)
2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 793 STATE v. BYRD. No. 2005-2160.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Defiance App. No. 4-05-19, 2005-Ohio-5612. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. KAVANAGH, 108 Ohio St.3d 1487 (2006)
2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 793 STATE v. KAVANAGH. No. 2005-2149.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Hamilton App. No. -040767. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent.
HUTCHINS v. FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYS., 108 Ohio St.3d 1486 (2006)
2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 793 HUTCHINS v. FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYS. No. 2006-0219.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Summit App. No. 22551, 2005-Ohio-6738. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion denied. Page 1487
STATE v. BORDNER, 108 Ohio St.3d 1487 (2006)
2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 793 STATE v. BORDNER. No. 2005-1724.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Wayne App. No. 04CA0039, 2005-Ohio-1269. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
ZAVACKY v. A-BEST PROD. CO., INC., 108 Ohio St.3d 1487 (2006)
2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 793 ZAVACKY v. A-BEST PROD. CO., INC. No. 2005-2146.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 85833. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal not accepted. RESNICK, J., dissents. On motion for admission pro hac vice of Jason T. Shipp by John J. Duffy. Motion granted.
ROETENBERGER v. CHRIST HOSP., 108 Ohio St.3d 1487 (2006)
2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 793 ROETENBERGER v. CHRIST HOSP. No. 2005-2151.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Hamilton App. No. C-040009, 163 Ohio App.3d 555, 2005-Ohio-5205. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents.
AKRON GROUP SERVS. v. PATRON PLASTICS, 108 Ohio St.3d 1487 (2006)
2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 793 AKRON GROUP SERVS., INC. v. PATRON PLASTICS, INC. No. 2005-2150.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Summit App. No. 22507, 2005-Ohio-5101. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. SCHEIDEL, 108 Ohio St.3d 1486 (2006)
2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 793 STATE v. SCHEIDEL. No. 2006-0211.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Ashtabula App. No. 2003-A-0087, 2006-Ohio-195. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion granted. MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent.
LOFINO v. BERKEMEIER, 108 Ohio St.3d 1486 (2006)
2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 793 LOFINO v. BERKEMEIER. No. 2006-0204.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Greene App. No. 2005-CA-33, 2005-Ohio-6676. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion denied.
STATE v. HALL, 108 Ohio St.3d 1486 (2006)
2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 793 STATE v. HALL. No. 2006-0161.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Clark App. No. 05CA0006, 2005-Ohio-6672. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion denied.
STATE v. THOMAS, 108 Ohio St.3d 1486 (2006)
2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 793 STATE v. THOMAS. No. 2006-0191.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Hamilton App. No. C-050245, 2005-Ohio-6823. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay pending lower court decision. Motion denied.
STATE v. BYRD, 108 Ohio St.3d 1487 (2006)
2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 793 STATE v. BYRD. No. 2005-2161.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Defiance App. No. 4-05-18, 2005-Ohio-5613. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
IN RE ESTATE OF HOLYCROSS, 108 Ohio St.3d 1487 (2006)
2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 793 IN RE ESTATE OF HOLYCROSS. No. 2005-2281.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Champaign App. No. 2005 CA 1, 2005-Ohio-5582. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent.