STATE EX REL. NORFOLK S. RY. v. PUB. UTIL. COMM., 108 Ohio St.3d 1498 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1249, 844 N.E.2d 353 State ex rel. Norfolk S. Ry. Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm. No. 2006-0291.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 20, 2006. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS In Mandamus and Prohibition. On relator’s motion for stay of execution of the order issued by the Public Utilities Commission, respondent’s motion to dismiss, the motion for leave […]

Read More

OHIO CONSUMERS’ COUNSEL v. PUB. UTIL. COMM., 108 Ohio St.3d 1499 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1249, 844 N.E.2d 353 Ohio Consumers’ Counsel v. Pub. Util. Comm. No. 2005-1621.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 20, 2006. Public Utilities Commission, No. 04-1931-EL-AAM. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio. Upon consideration of appellee’s motion to dismiss, IT IS ORDERED […]

Read More

STATE v. UPSHAW, 108 Ohio St.3d 1499 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1249, 844 N.E.2d 353 State v. Upshaw. No. 2005-1047.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 20, 2006. Clark App. No. 05CA35. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS This cause is pending before the court on the certification of a conflict by the Court of Appeals for Clark County. Upon consideration of appellee’s motion for leave to be present at […]

Read More