2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 853 State v. Markin. No. 2006-0228.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Union App. No. 14-05-36. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. PFEIFER, O’CONNOR and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent.
Articles Tagged: 844 N.E.2d 853
STATE v. COLSTON, 108 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2006)
2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 853 State v. Colston. No. 2006-0272.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Clermont App. No. CA2004-11-099, 2005-Ohio-7031. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. Sua sponte, cause held for the decision in 2005-1347, State v. Buehner, Cuyahoga App. No. 84985, 161 […]
STATE v. ALEXANDER, 108 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2006)
2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 853 State v. Alexander. No. 2006-0258.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 85688, 2005-Ohio-5200. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion granted. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent.
IN RE J.J., 108 Ohio St.3d 1506 (2006)
2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 853 In re J.J. No. 2006-0064.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 86276, 2005-Ohio-6096. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion granted. MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, J., dissent.
STATE v. POOLE, 108 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2006)
2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 853 State v. Poole. No. 2006-0243.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 85277. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. PFEIFER, J., dissents.
STATE EX REL. HARDS v. KLAMMER, 108 Ohio St.3d 1506 (2006)
2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 853 State ex rel. Hards v. Klammer. No. 2005-1223.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Lake App. No. 2004-L-189, 2005-Ohio-2655. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion to reinstate stay of probate proceedings and motion to expedite consideration of that motion. Motions denied.
STATE v. BREININGER, 108 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2006)
2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 853 State v. Breininger. No. 2006-0262.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Defiance App. No. 4-05-14, 2005-Ohio-4748. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.
STATE v. HANCOCK, 108 Ohio St.3d 1506 (2006)
2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 853 State v. Hancock. No. 2006-0178.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Montgomery App. No. 19434, 2003-Ohio-2080 and 2005-Ohio-127. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. Page 1507
MID-AM. FIRE CAS. CO. v. HEASLEY, 108 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2006)
2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 853 Mid-Am. Fire Cas. Co. v. Heasley. No. 2006-0249.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Lake App. No. 2004-L-115, 2005-Ohio-6072. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issues stated at page 5 of the court […]
STATE v. PAHOUNDIS, 108 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2006)
2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 853 State v. Pahoundis. No. 2006-0198.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Coshocton App. No. 05-CA-009, 2005-Ohio-6111. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. MOYER, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissent.
STATE v. YOUNG, 108 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2006)
2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 853 State v. Young. No. 2006-0242.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Franklin App. No. 04AP-797, 2005-Ohio-5489. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. PFEIFER, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent.
STATE v. CARTER, 108 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2006)
2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 853 State v. Carter. No. 2006-0200.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Butler App. No. CA2004-10-257. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. PFEIFER, J., dissents.
STATE v. MOCTEZUMA, 108 Ohio St.3d 1506 (2006)
2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 853 State v. Moctezuma. No. 2006-0097.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Lucas App. No. L-04-1347, 2005-Ohio-5569. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion granted. RESNICK, J., dissents.
SHAY v. SHAY, 108 Ohio St.3d 1506 (2006)
2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 853 Shay v. Shay. No. 2005-2277.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Fulton App. No. F-05-008, 2005-Ohio-5874. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issues stated at page 14 of the court of appeals’ Decision […]