2006-Ohio-1703, 845 N.E.2d 519 State ex rel. Buoscio v. Court of Appeals, Tenth Appellate Dist. 2006-0179.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 12, 2006. In Mandamus. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS On respondent’s answer and motion for judgment on the pleadings. On S.Ct.Prac.R. X(5) determination and consideration of the motion for judgment on the pleadings, cause dismissed. MOYER, […]
Articles Tagged: 845 N.E.2d 519
STATE v. COLEMAN, 109 Ohio St.3d 1401 (2006)
2006-Ohio-1731, 845 N.E.2d 519 State v. Coleman. 2005-2263.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 7, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 85807, 2005-Ohio-5849. MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. Upon consideration of appellant’s application for dismissal, IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal […]
STATE v. SPEARS, 109 Ohio St.3d 1401 (2006)
2006-Ohio-1731, 845 N.E.2d 519 State v. Spears. 2006-0271.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 7, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 86229, 2006-Ohio-167. MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS This Cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. Upon consideration of appellant’s application for dismissal, IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal […]
STATE EX REL BANDLOW v. LeBARRON, 109 Ohio St.3d 1401 (2006)
2006-Ohio-1731, 845 N.E.2d 519 State ex rel. Bandlow v. LeBarron. 2004-1832.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 7, 2006. In Mandamus. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS This cause came on for further consideration of relators’ motion for relief from judgment. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion is denied.
STATE v. HINTON, 109 Ohio St.3d 1401 (2006)
2006-Ohio-1768, 845 N.E.2d 519, 2006-Ohio-1768 State v. Hinton. 2005-1534.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 10, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 84582, 2005-Ohio-3427. MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court for appeals for Cuyahoga County. Upon consideration of appellant’s application for dismissal, IT IS ORDERED by the court that the […]
STATE v. CLARK, 109 Ohio St.3d 1402 (2006)
2006-Ohio-1803, 845 N.E.2d 519 State v. Clark. 1987-0327.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 11, 2006. Lucas App. No. L-84-443. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS By entry filed March 8, 2006, this court ordered that appellant’s sentence be carried into execution on Tuesday, the 2nd day of May, 2006. In order to facilitate this court’s timely consideration of […]