NATL. CITY BANK v. WILKINS, 109 Ohio St.3d 1409 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1826, 845 N.E.2d 524 Natl. City Bank v. Wilkins. 2005-1566.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 13, 2006. Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2003-A-1330. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals. Upon consideration of appellant’s request for oral argument, IT IS ORDERED by the […]

Read More

STATE v. FOSTER, 109 Ohio St.3d 1408 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1703, 845 N.E.2d 524 State v. Foster. 2004-1568.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 12, 2006. Licking App. No. 03CA95, 2004-Ohio-4209. Reported at 109 Ohio St.3d 1, 2006-Ohio-856, ___ N.E.2d ___. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Read More

TELXON CORP. v. SMART MEDIA OF DELAWARE, INC., 109 Ohio St.3d 1408 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1703, 845 N.E.2d 524 Telxon Corp. v. Smart Media of Delaware, Inc. 2005-2076.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 12, 2006. Summit App. Nos. 22098 and 22099, 2005-Ohio-4931. Reported at 108 Ohio St.3d 1473, 2006-Ohio-665, 842 N.E.2d 1053. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration Smart Media of Delaware, Inc. and William J. Dupree. Motions denied. […]

Read More

STATE v. QUINONES, 109 Ohio St.3d 1408 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1703, 845 N.E.2d 524 State v. Quinones. 2004-1771.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 12, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485. Reported at 109 Ohio St.3d 1, 2006-Ohio-856, ___ N.E.2d ___. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Read More

NATL. CITY BANK v. WILKINS, 109 Ohio St.3d 1409 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1826, 845 N.E.2d 524 Natl. City Bank v. Wilkins. 2005-1562.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 13, 2006. Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2003-A-1328. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals. Upon consideration of appellant’s request for oral argument, IT IS ORDERED by the […]

Read More

SARKA v. LOVE, 109 Ohio St.3d 1408 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1703, 845 N.E.2d 524 Sarka v. Love. 2006-0095.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 12, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 85960, 2005-Ohio-6362. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LUNDBERG STRATTON and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent.

Read More

STATE v. ABSHEAR, 109 Ohio St.3d 1408 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1703, 845 N.E.2d 524 State v. Abshear. 2005-2138.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 12, 2006. Clark App. No. 03CA0012, 2004-Ohio-1322. Reported at 108 Ohio St.3d 1474, 2006-Ohio-665, 842 N.E.2d 1054. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Read More

NATL. CITY BANK v. WILKINS, 109 Ohio St.3d 1409 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1826, 845 N.E.2d 524 Natl. City Bank v. Wilkins. 2005-1564.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 13, 2006. Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2003-A-1329. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals. Upon consideration of appellant’s request for oral argument, IT IS ORDERED by the […]

Read More

STATE v. LUCKETT, 109 Ohio St.3d 1408 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1703, 845 N.E.2d 524 State v. Luckett. 2005-2238.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 12, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 85677, 2005-Ohio-5199. Reported at 108 Ohio St.3d 1475, 2006-Ohio-665, 842 314.E.2d 1054. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied. MOYER, C.J., LUNDBERG STRATTON and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent. Page 1409

Read More

NATL. CITY BANK v. WILKINS, 109 Ohio St.3d 1409 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1826, 845 N.E.2d 524 Natl. City Bank v. Wilkins. 2005-1563.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 13, 2006. Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2003-A-1327. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals. Upon consideration of appellant’s request for oral argument, IT IS ORDERED by the […]

Read More

NATL. CITY BANK v. WILKINS, 109 Ohio St.3d 1409 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1826, 845 N.E.2d 524 Natl. City Bank v. Wilkins. 2005-1565.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 13, 2006. Board of Tax Appeals:, No. 2003-A-1326. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals. Upon consideration of appellant’s request for oral argument, IT IS ORDERED by the […]

Read More