STATE v. HENLEY, 109 Ohio St.3d 1427 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1967, 846 N.E.2d 536 State v. Henley. 2005-2294.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 26, 2006. Montgomery App. No. 20789, 2005-Ohio-6142. Reported at 108 Ohio St.3d 1489, 2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 795. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Read More

STATE EX REL. BLACK v. HOLMES, 109 Ohio St.3d 1427 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1967, 846 N.E.2d 536 State ex rel. Black v. Holmes. 2005-2382.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 26, 2006. In Mandamus. Reported at 108 Ohio St.3d 1469, 2006-Ohio-665, 842 N.E.2d 1050. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS Page 1428

Read More

STATE v. FAIR, 109 Ohio St.3d 1427 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1967, 846 N.E.2d 536 State v. Fair. 2004-1267.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 26, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 82278, 2004-Ohio-2971. Reported at 109 Ohio St.3d 54, 2006-Ohio-855, ___ N.E.2d ___. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Read More

STATE v. MATHIS, 109 Ohio St.3d 1427 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1967, 846 N.E.2d 536 State v. Mathis. 2004-1171.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 26, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 83311, 2004-Ohio-2982. Reported at 109 Ohio St.3d 54, 2006-Ohio-855, ___ N.E.2d ___. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Read More

TARR v. WILLIAMS, 109 Ohio St.3d 1428 (2006)

2006-Ohio-2056, 846 N.E.2d 536 Tarr v. Williams. 2006-0202.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 27, 2006. In Habeas Corpus. This cause came on for further consideration of petitioner’s motion for relief from judgment. Upon consideration thereof, MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion is denied.

Read More

STATE v. BYRD, 109 Ohio St.3d 1427 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1967, 846 N.E.2d 536 State v. Byrd. 2005-2160.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 26, 2006. Defiance App. No. 4-05-19, 2005-Ohio-5612. Reported at 108 Ohio St.3d 1487, 2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 793. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Read More

OHIO CONSUMERS’ COUNSEL v. PUBLIC UTIL. COMM., 109 Ohio St.3d 1428 (2006)

2006-Ohio-2056, 846 N.E.2d 536 Ohio Consumers’ Counsel v. Public Util. Comm. 2006-0701.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 27, 2006. Public Utilities Commission, Nos. 05-732-EL-MER, 05-733-EL-AAM, and 05-974-GA-AAM. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS This cause is pending before this court as an appeal from the Public Utilities Commission. Upon consideration of the motion of Duke Energy Corporation and […]

Read More