Articles Tagged: 848 N.E.2d 515

FUNCK v. PIERCE, 109 Ohio St.3d 1485 (2006)

2006-Ohio-2589, 848 N.E.2d 515 Funck v. Pierce. 2006-0819.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 26, 2006. Hamilton App. No. C-050487. MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. It appears from the records of the court that the appellant has not filed a memorandum in support of […]

Read More →

STATE v. TOOLEY, 109 Ohio St.3d 1403 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1703, 845 N.E.2d 521, 848 N.E.2d 515 State v. Tooley. 2006-0216.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 12, 2006. Portage App. No. 2004-P-0064, 2005-Ohio-6709. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at pages 2-3 of the court of […]

Read More →

STATE v. STROWDER, 109 Ohio St.3d 1485 (2006)

2006-Ohio-2589, 848 N.E.2d 515 State v. Strowder. 2006-0644.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 26, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 85792, 2006-Ohio-442. MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. Upon consideration of appellant’s application for dismissal, IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal […]

Read More →

STATE v. TOOLEY, 109 Ohio St.3d 1405 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1703, 845 N.E.2d 522, 848 N.E.2d 515 State v. Tooley. 2006-0105.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 12, 2006. Portage App. No. 2004-P-0064, 2005-Ohio-6709. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted and cause consolidated with 2006-0216, State v. Tooley, Portage App. No. 2004-P-0064, 2005-Ohio-6709.

Read More →