2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1029 State v. Mayes. No. 2006-0197.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 86203, 2006-Ohio-105. Reported at 109 Ohio St.3d 1426, 2006-Ohio-1967, 846 N.E.2d 535. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
Articles Tagged: 849 N.E.2d 1029
CHASE MTGE. SERV., INC. v. LATSA, 109 Ohio St.3d 1509 (2006)
2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1029 Chase Mtge. Serv., Inc. v. Latsa. No. 2006-0053.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 85682, 2005-Ohio-6021. Reported at 109 Ohio St.3d 1423, 2006-Ohio-1967, 846 N.E.2d 533. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration, amended motion for reconsideration, and motion to clarify. Motions denied.
STATE v. CORAN, 109 Ohio St.3d 1509 (2006)
2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1029 State v. Coran. No. 2005-1323.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Clark App. No. 2003-CA-80, 2004-Ohio-6874. Reported at 109 Ohio St.3d 313, 2006-Ohio-2109, 847 N.E.2d 1174. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
STATE v. LOHMEYER, 109 Ohio St.3d 1508 (2006)
2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1029 State v. Lohmeyer. No. 2006-0728.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Lucas App. No. L-05-1059. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. BROWN, 109 Ohio St.3d 1509 (2006)
2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1029 State v. Brown. No. 2005-1874.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Lucas App. No. L-04-1148, 2005-Ohio-4348. Reported at 109 Ohio St.3d 313, 2006-Ohio-2109, 847 N.E.2d 1174. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
OHIO CONSUMERS’ COUNSEL v. PUB. UTIL. COMM., 109 Ohio St.3d 1509 (2006)
2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1029 Ohio Consumers’ Counsel v. Pub. Util. Comm. No. 2004-1993.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Public Utilities Commission, Nos. 03-2144-EL-AAM, 03-2144-EL-ATA and 03-2144-EL-UNC. Reported at 109 Ohio St.3d 328, 2006-Ohio-2110, 847 N.E.2d 1184. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration of First Energy Corporation. Motion denied. O’CONNOR and LANZINGER, JJ., […]
OHIO CONSUMERS’ COUNSEL v. PUB. UTIL. COMM., 109 Ohio St.3d 1509 (2006)
2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1029 Ohio Consumers’ Counsel v. Pub. Util. Comm. No. 2005-0766.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Public Utilities Commission, No. 03-2144-EL-ATA. Reported at 109 Ohio St.3d 328, 2006-Ohio-2110, 847 N.E.2d 1184. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration of First Energy Corporation. Motion denied. O’CONNOR and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent. On motion […]
STATE v. TRAVIS, 109 Ohio St.3d 1508 (2006)
2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1029 State v. Travis. No. 2006-0680.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 86328, 2006-Ohio-802. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. LE, 109 Ohio St.3d 1508 (2006)
2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1029 State v. Le. No. 2006-0719.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 87687. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
MAUMEE v. PUB. UTIL. COMM., 109 Ohio St.3d 1509 (2006)
2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1029 Maumee v. Pub. Util. Comm. No. 2005-0118.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Public Utilities Commission, No. 03-2144-EL-ATA. Reported at 109 Ohio St.3d 328, 2006-Ohio-2110, 847 N.E.2d 1184. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration of First Energy Corporation. Motion denied. O’CONNOR and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent.
STATE v. SHUGARS, 109 Ohio St.3d 1508 (2006)
2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1029 State v. Shugars. No. 2006-0668.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Hamilton App. No. C-050380, 165 Ohio App.3d 379, 2006-Ohio-718. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. THOMAS, 109 Ohio St.3d 1508 (2006)
2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1029 State v. Thomas. No. 2006-0659.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 85968, 2006-Ohio-280. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
ARCHITECTURAL INTERIOR PROD. v. MIARER TRANSP., 109 Ohio St.3d 1508 (2006)
2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1029 Architectural Interior Prod., Inc. v. Miarer Transp., Inc. No. 2006-0653.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Muskingum App. No. CT2005-0052, 2006-Ohio-824. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal not accepted. Motion for order to show cause denied. LANZINGER, J., would grant the motion for order to show cause.
STATE v. BRADLEY, 109 Ohio St.3d 1509 (2006)
2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1029 State v. Bradley. No. 2006-0147.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Champaign App. No. 2004-CA-15, 2005-Ohio-6533. Reported at 109 Ohio St.3d 1425, 2006-Ohio-1967, 846 N.E.2d 534. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied. RESNICK and O’CONNOR, JJ., dissent.
ARNOLD CARUSO v. NYKTAS, 109 Ohio St.3d 1509 (2006)
2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1029 Arnold Caruso v. Nyktas. No. 2006-0135.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Lucas App. No. L-05-1011, 2005-Ohio-5566. Reported at 109 Ohio St.3d 1425, 2006-Ohio-1967, 846 N.E.2d 534. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied. RESNICK, J., not participating.
OLYNYK v. ANDRISH, 109 Ohio St.3d 1509 (2006)
2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1029 Olynyk v. Andrish. No. 2006-0235.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 86009, 2005-Ohio-6632. Reported at 109 Ohio St.3d 1420, 2006-Ohio-1967, 846 N.E.2d 531. On motion for reconsideration. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS Motion for reconsideration granted to the following extent: The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties […]
STATE v. QUINONES, 109 Ohio St.3d 1508 (2006)
2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1029 State v. Quinones. No. 2006-0733.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 87704. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
GALEHOUSE v. GEISER, 109 Ohio St.3d 1508 (2006)
2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1029 Galehouse v. Geiser. No. 2006-0669.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Wayne App. No. 05CA0037, 2006-Ohio-766. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. ENSEHUSIH, 109 Ohio St.3d 1508 (2006)
2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1029 State v. Ensehusih. No. 2006-0679.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Wayne App. No. 05CA0042, 2006-Ohio-651. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’CONNOR, J., dissents.
STATE v. FLEMING, 109 Ohio St.3d 1508 (2006)
2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1029 State v. Fleming. No. 2006-0736.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 85328, 2006-Ohio-706. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., and LANZINGER, J., dissent and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I. Page 1509
STATE v. GRAHAM, 109 Ohio St.3d 1508 (2006)
2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1029 State v. Graham. No. 2006-0725.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Franklin App. No. 05AP-588, 2006-Ohio-914. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW