Articles Tagged: 85 Ohio St.3d 1497

State v. Niehaus. No. 99-608.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 2, 1999. DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE, NO SUBSTANTIAL CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION AND DISCRETIONARY APPEALS, IF APPLICABLE, NOT ALLOWED Appeal from Hamilton App. No. C-930491.

State v. Sergent. No. 99-545.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 2, 1999. DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE, NO SUBSTANTIAL CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION AND DISCRETIONARY APPEALS, IF APPLICABLE, NOT ALLOWED Appeal from Montgomery App. No. 17249. MOYER, C.J., and COOK, J., dissent, would allow on Proposition of Law No. II, and would hold this cause for the decision in 98-2801, […]

Johnson v. Talley. No. 99-575.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 2, 1999. DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE, NO SUBSTANTIAL CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION AND DISCRETIONARY APPEALS, IF APPLICABLE, NOT ALLOWED Appeal from Cuyahoga App. No. 73581.

State v. Desellems. No. 99-526.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 2, 1999. DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE, NO SUBSTANTIAL CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION AND DISCRETIONARY APPEALS, IF APPLICABLE, NOT ALLOWED Appeal from Lake App. No. 98-L-053.

State v. Robinson. No. 99-577.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 2, 1999. DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE, NO SUBSTANTIAL CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION AND DISCRETIONARY APPEALS, IF APPLICABLE, NOT ALLOWED Appeal from Logan App. No. 8-97-20. MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, J., dissent.

State v. Grant. No. 99-592.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 2, 1999. DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE, NO SUBSTANTIAL CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION AND DISCRETIONARY APPEALS, IF APPLICABLE, NOT ALLOWED Appeal from Allen App. No. 1-96-37.

State v. McGaha. No. 99-555.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 2, 1999. DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE, NO SUBSTANTIAL CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION AND DISCRETIONARY APPEALS, IF APPLICABLE, NOT ALLOWED Appeal from Butler App. No. CA98-05-091. PFEIFER, J., dissents.

Barker v. Gibson. No. 99-561.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 2, 1999. DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE, NO SUBSTANTIAL CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION AND DISCRETIONARY APPEALS, IF APPLICABLE, NOT ALLOWED Appeal from Stark App. No. 1998CA00144.

Turner v. Goldberg. No. 99-527.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 2, 1999. DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE, NO SUBSTANTIAL CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION AND DISCRETIONARY APPEALS, IF APPLICABLE, NOT ALLOWED Appeal from Mahoning App. No. 96CA252. MOYER, C.J., dissents. COOK, J., not participating.

State v. Cummings. No. 99458.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 2, 1999. DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE, NO SUBSTANTIAL CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION AND DISCRETIONARY APPEALS, IF APPLICABLE, NOT ALLOWED Appeal from the Medina App. No. 2824-M. MOYER, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissent.

State v. Young. No. 99-666.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 2, 1999. DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE, NO SUBSTANTIAL CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION AND DISCRETIONARY APPEALS, IF APPLICABLE, NOT ALLOWED Appeal from Stark App. No. 1997CA00270. MOYER, C.J., and COOK, J., dissent, would allow on Propositions of Law Nos. III and IV, and would hold this cause for the decision […]

State v. Harris. No. 99-640.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 2, 1999. DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE, NO SUBSTANTIAL CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION AND DISCRETIONARY APPEALS, IF APPLICABLE, NOT ALLOWED Appeal from Sandusky App. No. S-97-048. RESNICK, J., not participating.

State v. Perdue. No. 99-630.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 2, 1999. DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE, NO SUBSTANTIAL CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION AND DISCRETIONARY APPEALS, IF APPLICABLE, NOT ALLOWED Appeal from Hamilton App. No. C-971112.

Am. Assn. of Univ. Professors, Cent. State Univ. Chapter v. Cent. State Univ. No. 97-568.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 2, 1999. MOTION DOCKET Appeal from Greene App. No. 96CA21. On motion to submit briefs on remand from United States Supreme Court. Page 1498 Motion granted. On motion for admission pro hac vice of State Solicitor […]

State v. Thigpen. No. 99-548.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 2, 1999. DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE, NO SUBSTANTIAL CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION AND DISCRETIONARY APPEALS, IF APPLICABLE, NOT ALLOWED Appeal from Stark App. No. 1997CA0284. MOYER, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissent.

State v. Wogenstahl. No. 99-632.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 2, 1999. DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE, NO SUBSTANTIAL CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION AND DISCRETIONARY APPEALS, IF APPLICABLE, NOT ALLOWED Appeal from Hamilton App. No. C-980175.

State v. Cumpian. No. 99-583.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 2, 1999. DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE, NO SUBSTANTIAL CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION AND DISCRETIONARY APPEALS, IF APPLICABLE, NOT ALLOWED Appeal from Henry App. No. 7-98-10.