State ex rel. Rashad v. Wilkinson. No. 99-1822.Supreme Court of Ohio. December 8, 1999. MERIT DOCKET In Mandamus. On answer of respondent. Answer treated as motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed. Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Articles Tagged: 87 Ohio St.3d 1458
STATE v. OATES, 87 Ohio St.3d 1458 (1999)
State v. Oates. No. 99-1723.Supreme Court of Ohio. December 8, 1999. DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE, NO SUBSTANTIALCONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION AND DISCRETIONARYAPPEALS, IF APPLICABLE, NOT ALLOWED Appeal from Hamilton, App. No. C-980650.
STATE v. WATSON, 87 Ohio St.3d 1458 (1999)
State v. Watson. No. 99-1731.Supreme Court of Ohio. December 8, 1999. DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE, NO SUBSTANTIALCONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION AND DISCRETIONARYAPPEALS, IF APPLICABLE, NOT ALLOWED Appeal from Lucas, App. No. L-99-1005.
STATE v. ERWIN, 87 Ohio St.3d 1458 (1999)
State v. Erwin. No. 99-1674.Supreme Court of Ohio. December 8, 1999. DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE, NO SUBSTANTIALCONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION AND DISCRETIONARYAPPEALS, IF APPLICABLE, NOT ALLOWED Appeal from Perry, App. No. 97CA66.
STATE EX REL. BERNARD v. KESSLER, 87 Ohio St.3d 1458 (1999)
State ex rel. Bernard v. Kessler. No. 99-1848.Supreme Court of Ohio. December 8, 1999. MERIT DOCKET In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, motion for summary judgment. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed. Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
ABNER v. MORGAN, 87 Ohio St.3d 1458 (1999)
Abner v. Morgan. No. 99-2005.Supreme Court of Ohio. December 8, 1999. MERIT DOCKET In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus by Antonio Abner. Sua sponte, cause dismissed. Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
STATE v. MACK, 87 Ohio St.3d 1458 (1999)
State v. Mack. No. 99-1734.Supreme Court of Ohio. December 8, 1999. DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE, NO SUBSTANTIALCONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION AND DISCRETIONARYAPPEALS, IF APPLICABLE, NOT ALLOWED Appeal from Franklin, App. No. 94APA07-992. Page 1459
STATE EX REL. HAMILTON v. TENTH D. CT., APP., 87 Ohio St.3d 1458 (1999)
State ex rel. Hamilton v. Tenth Dist. Court of Appeals. No. 99-1836.Supreme Court of Ohio. December 8, 1999. MERIT DOCKET In Procedendo. On answer of respondent. Answer treated as motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed. Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
SLAWSON v. ERIE ISLANDS RESORT MARINA, 87 Ohio St.3d 1458 (1999)
Slawson v. Erie Islands Resort Marina. No. 99-1711.Supreme Court of Ohio. December 8, 1999. DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE, NO SUBSTANTIALCONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION AND DISCRETIONARYAPPEALS, IF APPLICABLE, NOT ALLOWED Appeal from Ottawa, App. No. OT-98-042. Resnick, J., not participating.
STANSBURY v. STANSBURY, 87 Ohio St.3d 1458 (1999)
Stansbury v. Stansbury. No. 99-1732.Supreme Court of Ohio. December 8, 1999. DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE, NO SUBSTANTIALCONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION AND DISCRETIONARYAPPEALS, IF APPLICABLE, NOT ALLOWED Appeal from Licking, App. No. 99CA9.
STATE EX REL. TURK v. HANDWORK, 87 Ohio St.3d 1458 (1999)
State ex rel. Turk v. Handwork. No. 99-1846.Supreme Court of Ohio. December 8, 1999. MERIT DOCKET In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed. Moyer, C.J., Douglas, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Resnick, J., not participating.
THORN v. SCHNEIDERMAN-WELCH, 87 Ohio St.3d 1458 (1999)
Thorn v. Schneiderman-Welch. No. 99-1713.Supreme Court of Ohio. December 8, 1999. DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE, NO SUBSTANTIALCONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION AND DISCRETIONARYAPPEALS, IF APPLICABLE, NOT ALLOWED Appeal from Stark, App. No. 98CA00261.