2011-Ohio-19, 939 N.E.2d 1268 State v. Williams. No. 2010-2053.Supreme Court of Ohio. January 19, 2011. Hamilton App. No. C-090676. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
Articles Tagged: 939 N.E.2d 1268
MAHONING CTY. BAR ASSN. v. JONES, 127 Ohio St.3d 1506 (2011)
2011-Ohio-180, 939 N.E.2d 1268 Mahoning Cty. Bar Assn. v. Jones. No. 2009-0691.Supreme Court of Ohio. January 20, 2011. DISCIPLINARY CASES On October 1, 2009, this court suspended the respondent, James Sidney Jones, for a period of six months, with the entire suspension stayed on the conditions that respondent (1) successfully complete a one-year monitored probation […]
STATE v. DUNFORD, 127 Ohio St.3d 1505 (2011)
2011-Ohio-19, 939 N.E.2d 1268 State v. Dunford. No. 2010-1937.Supreme Court of Ohio. January 19, 2011. Ashtabula App. No. 2009-A-0027. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
IN RE O.W., 127 Ohio St.3d 1506 (2011)
2011-Ohio-19, 939 N.E.2d 1268 In re O.W. No. 2010-2077.Supreme Court of Ohio. January 19, 2011. Stark App. No. 2010-CA-00191, 2010-Ohio-5100. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. SIMMS, 127 Ohio St.3d 1506 (2011)
2011-Ohio-19, 939 N.E.2d 1268 State v. Simms. No. 2010-2096.Supreme Court of Ohio. January 19, 2011. Butler App. No. CA2009-08-206. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. PRATT, 127 Ohio St.3d 1505 (2011)
2011-Ohio-19, 939 N.E.2d 1268 State v. Pratt. No. 2010-1947.Supreme Court of Ohio. January 19, 2011. Cuyahoga App. No. 93123, 2010-Ohio-4998. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Page 1506
STATE v. ROSE, 127 Ohio St.3d 1506 (2011)
2011-Ohio-19, 939 N.E.2d 1268 State v. Rose. No. 2010-2013.Supreme Court of Ohio. January 19, 2011. Hamilton App. No. C-090609. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. HOPPEL, 127 Ohio St.3d 1506 (2011)
2011-Ohio-19, 939 N.E.2d 1268 Disciplinary Counsel v. Hoppel. No. 2010-1805.Supreme Court of Ohio. January 19, 2011. DISCIPLINARY CASES On motion to supplement record. Motion granted. O’Connor, C.J., dissents.