Articles Tagged: 955 N.E.2d 386

2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 386 State v. Hunter. No. 2011-1532.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Franklin App. No. 10AP-1005, 2011-Ohio-3654. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULING On motion for stay. Motion denied.

2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 386 State v. McGrath. No. 2011-1051.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Cuyahoga App. No. 93445, 2010-Ohio-4477. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 386 State v. Collier. No. 2011-1482.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Cuyahoga App. No. 95572, 2011-Ohio-2791. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULING On motion for delayed appeal. Motion denied. MCGEE BROWN, J., dissents

2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 386 Horvath v. Ish. No. 2011-1089.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Summit App. No. 25442, 2011-Ohio-2239. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Pfeifer, O’Donnell, and McGee Brown, JJ., dissent.

2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 386 Chesler v. Dollar Bank, Fed.Sav.Bank. No. 2011-0874.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Cuyahoga App. No. 95435, 193 Ohio App.3d 343, 2011-Ohio-1743. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LUNDBERG STRATTON and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., dissent.

2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 386 Troyer v. Janis. No. 2011-1162.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Franklin App. No. 10AP-434, 2011-Ohio-2538. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 386 State v. Noling. No. 2011-0778.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Portage C.P. No. 95CR220. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 386 State v. Lail. No. 2011-1092.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Montgomery App. No. 24118, 2011-Ohio-2312. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted and cause held for the decision in 2011-0215, In re M.W., Cuyahoga App. No. 94737, 2010-Ohio-6362; and briefing schedule stayed. CUPP, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition […]

2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 386 State v. Annable. No. 2011-0987.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Cuyahoga App. No. 94775, 2011-Ohio-2029. LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents and would accept the cross-appeal.

2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 386 State v. Smith. No. 2011-1056.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Cuyahoga App. No. 95505, 2011-Ohio-2400. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 386 State v. McCarroll. No. 2011-1540.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Cuyahoga App. No. 96868. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULING On motion for delayed appeal. Motion denied. PFEIFER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., dissent.

2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 386 Houdek v. ThyssenKrupp Materials N.A., Inc. No. 2011-1076.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Cuyahoga App. No. 95399, 2011-Ohio-1694. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LUNDBERG STRATTON, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., dissent.

2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 386 State v. Hobbs. No. 2011-1504.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Summit App. No. 25379, 2011-Ohio-3192. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULING The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the following issue set forth in the court of appeals’ entry dated August 5, 2011: “May a law enforcement […]

2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 386 Mackowiak v. Mackowiak. No. 2011-1299.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Fayette App. No. CA2010-04-009, 2011-Ohio-3013. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULING On motion for stay. Motion denied.

2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 386 State v. English. No. 2011-1522.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Hamilton App. No.C-100401. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULING On motion for delayed appeal. Motion denied. PFEIFER, J., dissents.

2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 386 State v. Harris. No. 2011-1074.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Hamilton App. No.C-100470, 2011-Ohio-2729. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 386 Wingates, L.L.C. v. South-Western City Schools Bd. of Edn. No. 2011-1046.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Franklin App. No. 10AP-846, 2011-Ohio-2372. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 386 Young v. Cuyahoga Cty.Bd.of Mental Retardation Developmental Disabilities. No. 2011-1073.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Cuyahoga App. No. 95955, 2011-Ohio-2291. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’CONNOR, C.J., AND LANZINGER, J., dissent and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I.

2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 386 State v. Brack. No. 2011-1496.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Stark App. No. 2010CA00061, 2011-Ohio-2949. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULING On motion for delayed appeal. Motion denied. PFEIFER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., dissent.