Articles Tagged: 955 N.E.2d 387

2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 State v. Ruark. No. 2011-1080.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Franklin App. No. 10AP-50, 2011-Ohio-2225. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 State v. Reddy. No. 2011-1106.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Cuyahoga App. No. 95814, 2011-Ohio-2927.

2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 State v. Wise. No. 2011-1103.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Hamilton App. No.C-100533.

2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 Johnson v. Cleveland City School Dist. No. 2011-1078.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Cuyahoga App. No. 94214, 2011-Ohio-2778. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LUNDBERG STRATTON, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., dissent.

2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 State v. Grenoble. No. 2011-1102.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Preble App. No.CA2010-09-011, 2011-Ohio-2343.

2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 EAC Properties, L.L.C. v. Brightwell. No. 2011-1130.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Franklin App. No. 10AP-853, 2011-Ohio-2373. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 Dzina v. Dzina. No. 2011-1098.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Cuyahoga App. No. 94748, 2011-Ohio-2668. O’DONNELL, J., dissents.

2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 Leak v. State Med.Bd.of Ohio. No. 2011-1113.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Franklin App. No. 09AP-1215, 2011-Ohio-2483. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MCGEE BROWN, J., not participating.

2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 State v. Phillips. No. 2011-1093.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Summit App. No. 25408, 2011-Ohio-1348. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LANZINGER, J., dissents and would accept the appeal and remand the case for application of State v. Davis, Slip Opinion No. 2011-Ohio-5028.

2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 State v. Harsh. No. 2011-1112.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Butler App. No.CA2007-03-083.

2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 Smith v. State. No. 2011-1087.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Franklin App. No. 10AP-646, 2011-Ohio-2415. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, J., dissent and would accept the appeal and hold the cause for the decision in 2010-1660 State v. Palmer, Franklin App. Nos. 09AP-956 and 09AP-957, 2010-Ohio-2421.

2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 State v. Pierce. No. 2011-1118.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Richland App. No. 10 CA 52, 2011-Ohio-2361. O’DONNELL, J., dissents. Page 1506

2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 State v. Capers. No. 2011-1129.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Lorain App. No. 10CA009801, 2011-Ohio-2443.

2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 Howard v. Girard. No. 2011-1123.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Trumbull App. No. 2010-T-0096, 2011-Ohio-2331.

2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 Target Industries v. Stubbs. No. 2011-1101.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Cuyahoga App. No. 95101, 2011-Ohio-1563. LANZINGER and CUPP, JJ., dissent.

2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 4747 Mann, L.L.C. v. Cuyahoga Cty.Bd.of Revision. No. 2011-1100.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Cuyahoga App. No. 95596, 2011-Ohio-2593. PFEIFER, J., dissents.

2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 State v. White. No. 2011-1127.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Franklin App. No. 10AP-34, 2011-Ohio-2364. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 State v. Ogden. No. 2011-1088.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Franklin App. No. 09AP-640, 2011-Ohio-1589. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LANZINGER, J., dissents and would accept the appeal and hold the cause for the decision in 2010-1660, State v. Palmer, Franklin App. Nos. 09AP-956 and 09AP-957, 2010-Ohio-2421.

2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 State v. King. No. 2011-1086.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Richland App. No. 08-CA-335. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Page 1505

2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 State v. Scurry. No. 2011-1084.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Summit App. No. 25116, 2011-Ohio-2243. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW CUPP, J., dissents.

2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 State v. Kondush. No. 2011-1099.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Cuyahoga App. No. 95526, 2011-Ohio-1963.

2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 State v. Perry. No. 2011-1082.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Summit App. No. 25271, 2011-Ohio-2242. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 Bank of Am., N.A. v. Omega Design/Build Group, L.L.C. No. 2011-1079.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Hamilton App. No.C-100018, 2011-Ohio-1650. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’CONNOR, C.J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I.

2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 Cornell v. Clerac, Inc. No. 2011-1117.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Cuyahoga App. No. 96517. PFEIFER, J., dissent. Motion to strike denied as moot.

2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 Art v. Erwin. No. 2011-1108.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Franklin App. No. 10AP-747, 2011-Ohio-2371. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 Summit Cty.Children Servs. Bd. v. Ohio State Personnel Bd. of Review. No. 2011-1132.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Franklin App. No. 10AP-780, 2011-Ohio-2543. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Lundberg Stratton, J. dissents.

2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 Morrissette v. DFS Servs., L.L.C. No. 2011-1128.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Franklin App. No. 10AP-633, 2011-Ohio-2369. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 State v. Tuleta. No. 2011-1121.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Cuyahoga App. No. 94992, 2011-Ohio-1923.

2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 Cleveland v. Cunningham. No. 2011-1083.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Cuyahoga App. No. 95267, 2011-Ohio-2276. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’Donnell, J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I.

2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 In re G.S. No. 2011-1090.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Cuyahoga App. Nos. 96158, 96159, and 96160, 2011-Ohio-2158. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 Strodtbeck v. Lake Hosp. Sys., Inc. No. 2011-1122.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Lake App. No. 2010-L-053, 2011-Ohio-2327.

2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 Cuyahoga Metro.Hous.Auth. v. Rabb. No. 2011-1085.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Cuyahoga App. No. 95658, 2011-Ohio-2287. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 Cleveland Hts. v. Ricks. No. 2011-1091.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Cuyahoga App. No. 96350. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW