2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 State v. Black. No. 2011-1140.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Columbiana App. No. 11 CO 8.
Articles Tagged: 955 N.E.2d 388
STATE v. HAMILTON, 129 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 State v. Hamilton. No. 2011-1161.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Scioto App. No. 09CA3330, 2011-Ohio-2783.
STATE v. PARSONS, 129 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 State v. Parsons. No. 2011-1334.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Auglaize App. No. 2-10-27. Page 1508
STATE v. AJUMU, 129 Ohio St.3d 1506 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 State v. Ajumu. No. 2011-1144.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Cuyahoga App. No. 95285, 2011-Ohio-2520. O’DONNELL, J., dissents.
EYSOLDT v. PROSCAN IMAGING, 129 Ohio St.3d 1506 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 Eysoldt v. Proscan Imaging. No. 2011-1135.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Hamilton App. No. C-100528, 2011-Ohio-2359. LUNDBERG STRATTON and LANZINGER, J. dissent.
STATE v. MAERLENDER, 129 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 State v. Maerlender. No. 2011-1175.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Cuyahoga App. No. 95071, 2011-Ohio-2515.
STATE v. FAIRBANKS, 129 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 State v. Fairbanks. No. 2011-1295.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Ashland App. No. 10 COA 004. O’DONNELL, J., dissents.
STATE v. MITCHELL, 129 Ohio St.3d 1506 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 State v. Mitchell. No. 2011-1152.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Butler App. No. CA2010-05-107, 2011-Ohio-2465.
STATE v. BEDINGHAUS, 129 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 State v. Bedinghaus. No. 2011-1167.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Hamilton App. No. C-100478. O’DONNELL, J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law
STATE v. DORITY, 129 Ohio St.3d 1506 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 State v. Dority. No. 2011-1141.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Erie App. No.E-09-027, 2011-Ohio-2438.
STATE v. PETITTO, 129 Ohio St.3d 1506 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 State v. Petitto. No. 2011-1137.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Cuyahoga App. No. 95276, 2011-Ohio-2391.
STATE v. SCHAIM, 129 Ohio St.3d 1506 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 State v. Schaim. No. 2011-1148.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Hamilton App. No. C-100704.
STATE v. ADAMS, 129 Ohio St.3d 1506 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 State v. Adams. No. 2011-1134.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Union App. No. 14-11-08.
STATE v. GREENLEE, 129 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 State v. Greenlee. No. 2011-1173.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Hamilton App. No. C-100739.
LITIGATION MGT., INC. v. BOURGEOIS, 129 Ohio St.3d 1506 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 Litigation Mgt., Inc. v. Bourgeois. No. 2011-1153.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Cuyahoga App. No. 95730, 2011-Ohio-2794. O’CONNOR, C.J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I. PFEIFER, J., dissents. Page 1507
STATE v. ANDERSON, 129 Ohio St.3d 1506 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 State v. Anderson. No. 2011-1145.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Hamilton App. No. C-110030.
STATE v. GARRETT, 129 Ohio St.3d 1508 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 State v. Garrett. No. 2011-1458.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Stark App. No. 2010-CA-00210.
STATE v. ORTEGA-MARTINEZ, 129 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 State v. Ortega-Martinez. No. 2011-1169.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Cuyahoga App. No. 95656, 2011-Ohio-2540. O’Donnell, J., dissents and would accept the appeal and hold the cause for the decision in 2011-0442, Clager v. State, Licking App. No. 10-CA-49, 2010-Ohio-6074. CUPP, J., dissents.
VASSIL v. GROSS GROSS, 129 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 Vassil v. Gross Gross, L.L.C. No. 2011-1168.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Cuyahoga App. No. 94919, 2011-Ohio-1920. O’DONNELL, J., dissents.
STATE EX REL. DEWINE v. TRI-STATE GROUP, 129 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 State ex rel. DeWine v. Tri-State Group, Inc. No. 2011-1158.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Belmont App. No. 07-BE-38, 2011-Ohio-2719.
STATE v. KNAUFF, 129 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 State v. Knauff. No. 2011-1156.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Adams App. No. 10CA900, 2011-Ohio-2725.
STATE v. THOMAS, 129 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 State v. Thomas. No. 2011-1165.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Cuyahoga App. No. 95754, 2011-Ohio-2542.
STATE v. PRESTON, 129 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 State v. Preston. No. 2011-1160.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Jackson App. No. 10CA4.
LIMA v. BOWERSOCK, 129 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 Lima v. Bowersock. No. 2011-1164.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Allen App. No. 1-11-22.
ORTEGA-MARTINEZ v. STATE, 129 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 Ortega-Martinez v. State. No. 2011-1171.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Cuyahoga App. No. 95930, 2011-Ohio-3069. O’Donnell, J., dissents and would accept the appeal and hold the cause for the decision in 2011-0442, Clager v. State, Licking App. No. 10-CA-49, 2010-Ohio-6074. CUPP, J., dissents.
SCHABEL v. TROYAN, 129 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 Schabel v. Troyan. No. 2011-1157.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Geauga App. Nos. 2010G2953 and 2010G2954, 2011-Ohio-2452.
STATE v. MILLER, 129 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 State v. Miller. No. 2011-1174.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Stark App. No. 2011-CA-00074, 2011-Ohio-3039.
GROVE CITY v. BUCK, 129 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 Grove City v. Buck. No. 2011-1163.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Franklin App. 10AP-1039, 2011-Ohio-1549. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’DONNELL, J., dissents.
STATE v. DEMUS, 129 Ohio St.3d 1508 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 State v. Demus. No. 2011-1372.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Montgomery App. No. 23801.
STATE v. RIDLEY, 129 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 State v. Ridley. No. 2011-1155.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Hamilton App. No. C-100301, 2011-Ohio-2477.
BOGGS v. BAUM, 129 Ohio St.3d 1506 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 Boggs v. Baum. No. 2011-1138.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Franklin App. No. 10AP-864, 2011-Ohio-2489. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. HALL, 129 Ohio St.3d 1506 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 State v. Fredrick Hall. No. 2011-1147.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Hamilton App. No. C-100097, 2011-Ohio-2527.
STATE v. WILLIAMS, 129 Ohio St.3d 1506 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 State v. Williams. No. 2011-1142.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Cuyahoga App. No. 95483, 2011-Ohio-2397.