135 N.E.2d 63

TORSKI, APPELLANT v. THE MANSFIELD JOURNAL CO., APPELLEE.

No. 34726Supreme Court of Ohio.
Decided April 25, 1956.

Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Action for libel — Newspaper account of arrest — Privileged publication — Statutory construction — Section 2317.05, Revised Code — Constitutionality — Section 16, Article I, Constitution — Section 1, Article XIV, Amendments, U.S. Constitution — Necessity of showing malice — Presumption and burden of proof — Evidence.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Richland County.

Messrs. Mayer McClellan, for appellant.

Mr. C.H. Henkel and Mr. Frank Kane, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., MATTHIAS, HART, ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, BELL and TAFT, JJ., concur.

Page 246

Tagged: