186 N.E. 96
No. 23733Supreme Court of Ohio.
Decided November 9, 1932.
Supreme Court — Dismissals — No debatable constitutional question involved.
ERROR to the Court of Appeals of Lucas county.
Mr. Carl J. Christensen, prosecuting attorney, Mr. Arnold F. Bunge, Mr. Orion W. Nelson and Mr. Edward H. Ray, for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. Garrison Phillips, Mr. H.J. Chittenden, Messrs. Fraser, Hiett, Wall Effler, Messrs. Holbrook Banker, Messrs. Marshall, Melhorn, Marlar Martin, Mr. Gustavus Ohlinger, Messrs. Rowe, Williams Dillon and Messrs. Taber, Chittenden Daniells, for defendants in error.
It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.
Petition in error dismissed.
MARSHALL, C.J., JONES, KINKADE and STEPHENSON, JJ., concur.
Page 651
53 N.E.3d 818 (2015)2015-Ohio-5019 CUSPIDE PROPERTIES, LTD., Appellee/Cross-Appellant v. EARL MECHANICAL SERVICES, Inc., Appellant/Cross-Appellee v.…
McCammon v. Cooper, 69 Ohio St. 366 (1904) Jan. 5, 1904 · Supreme Court of Ohio · No. 8237…
[Cite as Bank of Am., N.A. v. Smith, 2018-Ohio-3638.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST…
[Cite as State v. Marcum, 2018-Ohio-1009.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF…
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY IN RE: :…
March 13, 2017 The Honorable Paul J. Gains Mahoning County Prosecuting Attorney 6th Floor Administration…