WEINTRAUB v. BELL TEL. CO, 115 Ohio St. 731 (1926)

156 N.E. 214

WEINTRAUB v. THE OHIO BELL TELEPHONE CO.

No. 19005Supreme Court of Ohio.
Decided November 16, 1926.

Supreme Court — Affirmances — Judges equally divided in opinion.

ERROR to the Court of Appeals of Cuyahoga county.

Mr. G.Z. Weintraub, and Mr. Frank A. Green, for plaintiff in error.

Messrs. Tolles, Hogsett, Ginn Morley, Mr. W.T. Kinder, an Mr. J.W. Reavis, for defendant in error.

It appearing that the judges of the court are equally divided in opinion as to the merits of the case (one of the judges not participating) and are unable for that reason to agree upon a judgment, the entry of this fact constitutes an affirmance of the judgment of the court of appeals.

Judgment affirmed.

MATTHIAS, DAY and KINKADE, JJ., concur.

JONES, J., not participating.

Page 732

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 156 N.E. 214

Recent Posts

CUSPIDE PROPERTIES, LTD. v. EARL MECHANICAL SERVICES, INC., 53 N.E.3d 818 (2015)

53 N.E.3d 818 (2015)2015-Ohio-5019 CUSPIDE PROPERTIES, LTD., Appellee/Cross-Appellant v. EARL MECHANICAL SERVICES, Inc., Appellant/Cross-Appellee v.…

2 years ago

McCAMMON v. COOPER, 69 Ohio St. 366 (1904)

McCammon v. Cooper, 69 Ohio St. 366 (1904) Jan. 5, 1904 · Supreme Court of Ohio · No. 8237…

5 years ago

BANK OF AM., N.A. v. SMITH, 2018-Ohio-3638

[Cite as Bank of Am., N.A. v. Smith, 2018-Ohio-3638.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST…

7 years ago

STATE v. MARCUM, 2018-Ohio-1009 (2018)

[Cite as State v. Marcum, 2018-Ohio-1009.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF…

8 years ago

In re A.F., 2018-Ohio-310 (Oh. App. 1/26/2018)

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY IN RE: :…

8 years ago

Ohio Attorney General Opinion No. 2017-007

March 13, 2017 The Honorable Paul J. Gains Mahoning County Prosecuting Attorney 6th Floor Administration…

8 years ago