WHITESIDE v. OHIO DEPT. OF REHAB. CORR., Unpublished Decision (8-21-2006)

2006-Ohio-4739

No. 2005-07852.Court of Claims of Ohio.
Filed August 21, 2006.

Richard F. Swope, 6504 E. Main St., Reynoldsburg, Ohio 43068, Attorney for Plaintiff.

Jana M. Brown, Velda K. Hofacker Carr, Assistant Attorneys General, 150 East Gay Street, 23rd Floor, Columbus, Ohio 43215-3130, Attorneys for Defendant.

JUDGMENT ENTRY
JOSEPH T. CLARK, JUDGE

{¶ 1} On June 13, 2006, defendant filed a motion for summary judgment. The magistrate issued a decision recommending that defendant’s motion be granted, in part, and denied, in part.

{¶ 2} Upon review, the court determines that there is no error of law or other defect on the face of the magistrate’s decision. Therefore, the court adopts the magistrate’s decision and recommendation as its own. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, in part, as it pertains to plaintiff’s cause of action that accrued in 1989, and DENIED, in part, as it pertains to plaintiff’s claims involving the allegedly toxic cleaning product.