2009-Ohio-6935
No. 2009-2222.Supreme Court of Ohio.
December 31, 2009.
In Prohibition.
MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS
This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition. Upon consideration of relator’s motion for redaction,
It is ordered by the court that the motion is granted, and counsel for relator shall come to the Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk’s office and redact all personal identifiers, as defined by Rule 44(H) of the Rules of Superintendence for the Courts of Ohio, in this case within ten days of the date of this entry.
MISCELLANEOUS ORDERS
On December 23, 2009, the Commission on Continuing Legal Education (“commission”) entered a sanction order against the following attorney for failing to comply with Gov.Bar R. X for the 2009
Page 1420
reporting period and ordered the attorney to pay a sanction fee. It has come to the commission’s attention that this attorney was in compliance with Gov.Bar R. X for the 2009 reporting period and the December 23, 2009, sanction order entered against the attorney is vacated: