WOLFINGER v. SOUTHEASTERN CORRECTIONAL, Unpublished Decision (2-7-2005)

2005-Ohio-450

Christina A. Wolfinger, Plaintiff, v. Southeastern Correctional Institution, Defendant.

No. 2004-08481-AD.Court of Claims of Ohio.
February 7, 2005.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

Christina A. Wolfinger, 2860 Hamburg Road, Lancaster, Ohio 43130, Plaintiff, Pro se.

Gregory C. Trout, Chief Counsel, Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, 1050 Freeway Drive North, Columbus, Ohio 43229, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM DECISION
THE COURT FINDS THAT:

{¶ 1} 1) On August 25, 2004, plaintiff, Christina A. Wolfinger, filed a complaint against defendant, Southeastern Correctional Institution, alleging her automobile was damaged when the vehicle struck an animal owed by defendant. Plaintiff seeks damages in the amount of $928.42 for automotive repair. The filing fee was submitted with the complaint;

{¶ 2} 2) On November 22, 2004, defendant filed an investigation report admitting liability and acknowledging plaintiff suffered damages in the amount of $928.42;

{¶ 3} 3) On December 1, 2004, plaintiff filed a response expressing her agreement with defendant’s investigation report.

THE COURT CONCLUDES THAT:

{¶ 4} 1) I find, by a preponderance of the evidence, negligence by defendant has been shown. Baisden v. Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
(1977), 76-0617-AD; Stewart v. Ohio National Guard (1979), 78-0342-AD;

{¶ 5} 2) Plaintiff has suffered damages in the amount of $928.42, plus the $25.00 filing fee, which may be reimbursed as compensable damages pursuant to the holding in Bailey v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (1990), 62 Ohio Misc. 2d 19.

ENTRY OF ADMINISTRATIVE DETERMINATION
Having considered all the evidence in the claim file and, for the reasons set forth in the memorandum decision filed concurrently herewith, judgment is rendered in favor of plaintiff in the amount of $953.42, which includes the filing fee. Court costs are assessed against defendant. The clerk shall serve upon all parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle

Recent Posts

CUSPIDE PROPERTIES, LTD. v. EARL MECHANICAL SERVICES, INC., 53 N.E.3d 818 (2015)

53 N.E.3d 818 (2015)2015-Ohio-5019 CUSPIDE PROPERTIES, LTD., Appellee/Cross-Appellant v. EARL MECHANICAL SERVICES, Inc., Appellant/Cross-Appellee v.…

2 years ago

McCAMMON v. COOPER, 69 Ohio St. 366 (1904)

McCammon v. Cooper, 69 Ohio St. 366 (1904) Jan. 5, 1904 · Supreme Court of Ohio · No. 8237…

5 years ago

BANK OF AM., N.A. v. SMITH, 2018-Ohio-3638

[Cite as Bank of Am., N.A. v. Smith, 2018-Ohio-3638.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST…

7 years ago

STATE v. MARCUM, 2018-Ohio-1009 (2018)

[Cite as State v. Marcum, 2018-Ohio-1009.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF…

8 years ago

In re A.F., 2018-Ohio-310 (Oh. App. 1/26/2018)

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY IN RE: :…

8 years ago

Ohio Attorney General Opinion No. 2017-007

March 13, 2017 The Honorable Paul J. Gains Mahoning County Prosecuting Attorney 6th Floor Administration…

8 years ago